⚖ NY Bar Exam — DAG Study Guide

Desktop: hover nodes · Mobile: tap nodes · 22 subjects + study aids

Feb 2026 · NY Bar
1 / 26

Agency — NY Bar (MEE · Business Associations)

Hover / tap nodes · Authority · Principal Liability · Vicarious Liability · Agent Duties

AGENCY — AUTHORITY · PRINCIPAL/AGENT LIABILITY · VICARIOUS LIABILITY · DUTIES (MEE · BUSINESS ASSOCIATIONS) CREATION & AUTHORITY PRINCIPAL LIABILITY ON CONTRACTS VICARIOUS LIABILITY IN TORT AGENT DUTIES & TERMINATION AGENCY CREATION consent · principal capacity agent acts on P's behalf no writing req'd (generally) TYPES OF AUTHORITY actual: express + implied apparent · inherent ratification · estoppel PRINCIPAL LIABILITY disclosed · undisclosed partially disclosed principal agent's personal liability VICARIOUS LIABILITY respondeat superior employee vs. IC frolic · detour · scope AGENT DUTIES loyalty · care · obedience accounting · confidentiality termination methods Agency Defined P consents A to… on P's behalf su… to P's control Capacity P: must have K c… A: less capacity… minor can be agent Ratification P affirms A's un… act after the fa… full knowledge re… Actual Authori… express: explicit… implied: reasonab… necessary to carry… Apparent Autho… P's manifestation… third party → TP reasonably relies Disclosed Princ… TP knows P exists P liable; A not l… on authorized cont… Undisclosed Pri… TP doesn't know P… BOTH P and A liab… TP can elect which… Partially Di… TP knows A is… but not who P… BOTH P and A li… Respondeat Supe… employer liable f… employee torts wi… scope of employment Employee vs. IC control test: ho… is performed (no… the result) Duty of Loyalty no self-dealing no secret profits no compete with P Termination mutual consent ·… revocation · renu… death · incapacity AUTHORITY — ALL TYPES actual (express + implied) · apparent · inherent · ratification Express Author… explicit words or… from P to A direc… Implied Author… reasonably necess… accomplish expres… Apparent Auth… P's conduct → TP reasonably belie… Ratification & Inherent Agency Power Ratification: P affirms A's unauthorized act retroactively → P boun… Inherent authority (Restatement 2d): general agent acting in usual… PRINCIPAL LIABILITY ON CONTRACTS disclosed · undisclosed · partially disclosed · election Disclosed P P liable on K · A… TP knew P's identi… Undisclosed P BOTH P and A liable TP may elect whom… Agent Liabil… unauthorized ac… purported agent… Unauthorized Acts & Election Unauthorized acts: A alone liable unless P ratifies · P may be liab… Election: when undisclosed P is discovered, TP must elect to sue P… VICARIOUS LIABILITY — RESPONDEAT SUPERIOR employee test · scope of employment · frolic vs. detour Scope of Emplo… work-related; auth… or similar to auth… Frolic vs. Det… frolic: substantia… detour: minor devi… IC Exceptions non-delegable d… inherently dang… Employee vs. Independent Contractor Test Control test (primary): does employer control HOW the work is done… Employer generally NOT liable for IC's torts · EXCEPTIONS: non-dele… AGENT DUTIES & TERMINATION loyalty · care · obedience · accounting · termination rules Loyalty Detai… no self-dealing;… conflicts; no sec… Care & Ob… reasonable care i… follow P's lawful… Termination actual: notic… constructive:… Termination & Lingering Apparent Authority Actual authority ends: mutual agreement, lapse of time, comple… Apparent authority lingers after actual authority ends → P mus… ⚖ AUTHORITY ANALYSIS · PRINCIPAL DISCLOSURE · SCOPE OF EMPLOYMENT · AGENT DUTIES Authority analysis order: (1) Actual express? (2) Actual implied? (3) Apparent? (4) Ratification? → If any YES, P bound on the contract · Principal disclosure: Disclosed P (TP knows P's identity → P liable, A not liable) Partially disclosed (TP knows A is an agent but not P's identity → both liable) · Undisclosed (TP doesn't know P exists → both liable; TP may elect) Respondeat superior: employer liable for employee's torts within scope of employment · Frolic (substantial departure) = outside scope, employer NOT liable · Detour (minor deviation) = still within scope, employer liable IC general rule: employer NOT liable for IC's torts · Exceptions: non-delegable duty, inherently dangerous work, employer's own negligence Agent's duties to principal: loyalty (no self-dealing, no secret profits, disclose conflicts), care (reasonable care), obedience (follow lawful instructions), accounting (account for all P's property held)

← scroll to explore · hover nodes (desktop) or tap nodes (mobile) for full detail →

Business Associations — NY Bar (MEE)

Hover / tap nodes for exam notes · highly tested MEE subject

BUSINESS ASSOCIATIONS — ENTITY FORMATION THROUGH LIABILITY (MEE HIGH-FREQUENCY) AGENCY & PARTNERSHIP CORPORATIONS FIDUCIARY DUTIES LLC · SECURITIES · MERGERS AGENCY principal · agent relationship actual · apparent authority respondeat superior PARTNERSHIP GP · LP · LLP joint & several liability (GP) RUPA · UPA default rules CORPORATION formation · articles of incorp. shareholders · board · officers limited liability · separate entity FIDUCIARY DUTIES duty of care · duty of loyalty business judgment rule interested director transactions LLC & OTHER FORMS member-managed · manager-managed operating agreement · ULLCA pass-through taxation Actual Author… express (P's wor… implied (reasona… P manifests to ag… Apparent Auth. P's manifestation to third party T's reasonable be… Respondeat Su… employee (not in… contractor) scope of employme… Gen. Partnersh… all partners = a… joint & seve… no formalities re… LP & LLP LP: limited part… no mgmt. = no li… LLP: all partners… Formation articles of incor… bylaws · org. mee… de facto / by estop… Piercing the Ve… alter ego / fraud undercapitalizati… commingling of funds Shareholders annual meetings ·… derivative suits preemptive rights Duty of Care informed decision reasonable inquiry gross negligence s… Duty of Loyalty no self-dealing corp. opportunity… conflict of intere… LLC Structure articles of org. operating agreem… flexibility + LLC… Securities Rule 10b-5 · ins… trading · §16(b) §11 Securities Act AGENCY — AUTHORITY FRAMEWORK Restatement (Third) of Agency · principal bound when agent has… Ratification P adopts A's act after the fact Inherent Autho… general agent ac… for undisclosed P Partner Autho… each partner =… of partnership… Partnership Liability & Dissolution GP: joint & several; incoming partner not liable for prior… CORPORATION — GOVERNANCE MBCA · NY BCL · separate legal entity · perpetual existence Board of Direc… manage the busin… quorum + majorit… Officers appointed by boa… CEO · CFO · Secr… Derivative Su… SH sues on beha… demand requirem… Close Corporations & Special Rules SH agreements may restrict transfer of shares · Supermajority p… FIDUCIARY DUTIES — DIRECTORS & OFFICERS BJR protects care claims · Loyalty = no safe harbor · Most test… Business Judgm… informed · good… no conflict of i… Interested D T… safe harbor: fai… disclosure + dis… Corp. Opport… must offer to… first (line of… Indemnification & D&O Insurance Mandatory: successful defense · Permissive: good faith, best in… LLC · SECURITIES · M&A LLC = partnership flexibility + corporate liability shield LLC Management member-managed manager-managed Rule 10b-5 material nonpubl… duty to disclose… Mergers &… board + SH app… appraisal righ… Revlon / Unocal Duties in M&A Unocal enhanced scrutiny: defensive measures must be proporti… ⚖ ENTITY COMPARISON & CHOICE OF ENTITY Sole Prop: no formation, unlimited personal liability · GP: no formation, joint & several · LP: limited partners shielded if no control · LLP: all partners shielded for partner malpractice Corp: limited liability + double taxation (C-corp) or pass-through (S-corp) · LLC: limited liability + pass-through + maximum flexibility · NY LLC Act follows ULLCA with modifications

← scroll to explore · hover nodes (desktop) or tap nodes (mobile) for full detail →

Civil Procedure — NY Bar (MBE)

Hover / tap nodes for exam notes · MBE: 25 scored questions

CIVIL PROCEDURE — CASE LIFECYCLE (MBE: 25 SCORED QUESTIONS) JURISDICTION & VENUE — DETAILED ERIE DOCTRINE · JOINDER · CLASS ACTIONS PRECLUSION · APPEALS · JUDGMENT JURISDICTION personal · subject matter + venue threshold gatekeeping issues PLEADINGS complaint · answer · Rule 12 Rule 11 sanctions notice pleading · plausibility std DISCOVERY initial disclosures · depositions interrogatories · RFP · RFA scope: relevance · proportionality TRIAL & MOTIONS SJ · JMOL · New Trial 7th Amendment jury right burden of proof standards JUDGMENT & APPEALS final judgment rule · interlocutory claim preclusion · issue preclusion standards of review on appeal Personal Juris. general / specific min. contacts (Int… tag, consent, domic… Subject Matter federal question §… diversity §1332 supplemental §1367 Venue §1391 where D resides where events occur… transfer / forum no… Complaint / Answer short, plain statement Twombly plausibility affirmative defenses Rule 12 Motions 12(b)(1)–12(b)(7) 12(b)(6): fail to sta… waivable vs. non-waivab… Scope & Limits relevant + proportion… privilege / work prod… protective orders Discovery Tools depositions · interro… RFP · RFA · physical… ESI · sanctions Rule 37 Summary Judgment no genuine dispute of material fact viewed favorably to no… JMOL / New Trial JMOL: no legally suff. evidentiary basis RJMOL within 28 days Appeals final judgment rule interlocutory excepti… de novo · abuse of dis… PERSONAL JURISDICTION — DETAIL Due Process: minimum contacts + fair play & substantial justice International Shoe · Shaffer · Asahi · Goodyear · Daimler General PJ domicile / principal pl… of business (corps.) Specific PJ claim arises from D's contacts with forum Other Bases tag (transient) juris. consent · waiver Subject Matter Jurisdiction Fed. Question §1331: arises under federal law · Diversity §1332: complete diversity… ERIE DOCTRINE federal court sitting in diversity applies state substantive law Erie R.R. v. Tompkins (1938) · no federal general common law Subst. vs. Proced. Substantive: state law Procedural: FRCP governs Joinder of Parties permissive (R.20) · compul… necessary (R.19) · indispe… Class Actions R.23 numerosity · commonality typicality · adequacy Claim Joinder · Intervention · Impleader R.18 permissive claim joinder · R.14 impleader (3rd-party D) · R.24 intervention (right vs.… CLAIM & ISSUE PRECLUSION res judicata · collateral estoppel full faith & credit: federal judgment binding in all states Claim Preclusion same claim · final J on the merits · same pa… Issue Preclusion same issue · actually litigated & essenti… Appeal Standards law: de novo facts: clear error Final Judgment Rule & Exceptions 28 U.S.C. §1291: appeal only after final judgment · Exceptions: collateral order doc… ⚖ REMOVAL · CHOICE OF LAW · KEY DISTINCTIONS Removal §1441: D may remove if federal court would have had original jurisdiction · 30-day deadline · all Ds must consent · No removal if any D is citizen of forum state (diversity) Erie: SOL = substantive (apply state) · Elements of claim = substantive · Rules of evidence, pleading = procedural · Klaxon: fed. court applies forum state's conflict of laws rules

← scroll to explore · hover nodes (desktop) or tap nodes (mobile) for full detail →

Conflict of Laws — NY Bar (MEE)

Hover / tap nodes for exam notes · NY: interest analysis + Neumeier rules

CONFLICT OF LAWS — NY CHOICE OF LAW FRAMEWORK (MEE SUBJECT) TORTS · CHOICE OF LAW CONTRACTS · CHOICE OF LAW DOMICILE · FAMILY LAW JUDGMENTS · CONSTITUTIONAL LIMITS CHOICE OF LAW THRESHOLD characterize · true vs. false confli… apply forum rules first TORTS NY interest analysis (Babcock) Neumeier rules (loss allocation) conduct-reg. vs. loss-allocating CONTRACTS party choice of law clause Restatement (2nd) §188 contacts NY GOL §5-1401 ($250k+) DOMICILE & FAMILY marriage · divorce · custody law of domicile governs status UCCJEA (custody jurisdiction) JUDGMENTS full faith & credit recognition of foreign judgment constitutional limits on COL Characterizat… tort vs. contra… property vs. fa… forum characteri… True Conflict both states have legitimate inte… NY → forum law Renvoi does reference… foreign law inc… its COL rules? (… Interest Analy… NY's primary met… identify each st… governmental inte… Neumeier Rules loss-allocation… domicile-based (… Neumeier v. Kuehn… Party Choice generally enforced NY: substantial r… or reasonable basis §188 Contacts place of contract… negotiation · per… subject matter · do… Domicile presence + intent to remain indefin… one domicile at a… Marriage &… valid where celeb… → valid everywhere divorce: domicile… Custody UCCJEA home state (6 months) juris… FFC for custody o… Full Faith &am… sister-state judg… must be recognized Art. IV §1 · 28 US… Foreign J comity (not F… CPLR Art. 53 NY Recognitio… NY TORT CHOICE OF LAW — DETAIL Babcock v. Jackson (1963) · interest analysis replaces lex loci Neumeier Rule… P & D same d… → domicile law g… Neumeier Rule… different domici… → place of injur… Conduct-Reg. place of conduct vs. loss-allocati… Conduct-Reg. vs. Loss-Allocating Conduct-regulating (speed limit, duty): place of conduct · Los… CONTRACTS CHOICE OF LAW — DETAIL NY UCC §1-301 · GOL §5-1401 (NY choice clause enforcement) NY GOL §5-1401 NY law governs if $250k+ party choos… Contract Valid… formation: place of contracting (tradi… Performance law of state wh… performed gover… Party Autonomy & Limits Choice clause enforced unless: (1) no substantial relationship… DOMICILE, MARRIAGE & FAMILY LAW status governed by domicile · marriage: lex loci celebrationis Types of Domic… origin · choice ·… presence + intent… Marriage Valid… valid where celeb… = valid everywhere Property real: situs rule personal: domici… Divorce & Succession Divorce: domicile state has SMJ over status (Williams v. NC) ·… JUDGMENTS & CONSTITUTIONAL LIMITS FFC clause + Allstate constitutional limits on choice of law FFC Requireme… valid jurisdiction final + on the me… FFC Defenses no jurisdiction ·… lack of notice/he… Const. Limits DPC + FFC clause significant con… Foreign Nation Judgments (CPLR Art. 53) No FFC for foreign nation judgments — only comity · NY recogn… ⚖ NY APPROACH SUMMARY · PUBLIC POLICY EXCEPTION · DÉPEÇAGE NY torts: interest analysis (Babcock 1963) + Neumeier rules for loss-allocation · NY contracts: party autonomy (GOL §5-1401) + Restatement 2nd §188 if no clause · Property: situs rule for realty; domicile for movables Public Policy Exception: narrowly construed — mere difference insufficient · Dépeçage: different issues governed by laws of different states SOL: NY treats as procedural (forum SOL) unless CPLR §202 borrowing statute applies to non-NY accrual by non-NY resident

← scroll to explore · hover nodes (desktop) or tap nodes (mobile) for full detail →

Constitutional Law — NY Bar (MBE)

Hover / tap nodes for exam notes · MBE: 25 scored questions

CONSTITUTIONAL LAW — MBE FRAMEWORK (25 SCORED QUESTIONS) JUDICIAL POWER · STRUCTURE INDIVIDUAL RIGHTS — EQUAL PROTECTION FIRST AMENDMENT DUE PROCESS · OTHER RIGHTS JUDICIAL POWER Article III courts justiciability doctrines standing · ripeness · mootness FEDERAL STRUCTURE enumerated powers · Commerce Clause Supremacy · preemption 10th Amendment · state powers EQUAL PROTECTION 14th Amendment · strict scrutiny intermediate · rational basis suspect class · quasi-suspect FIRST AMENDMENT free speech · free exercise Establishment Clause press · assembly · petition DUE PROCESS substantive · procedural 5th (federal) · 14th (state) fundamental rights · privacy Standing injury · causati… redressability 3rd-party · assoc… Justiciability ripeness · mootn… advisory opinions political question SCOTUS Juris. original vs. app… certiorari (4 vo… adequate state gr… Commerce Clause channels · instru… substantial effect Lopez/Morrison limi… Supremacy / Pre… express · field ·… Dormant CC (neg.… Art. IV privileges Strict Scrutiny compelling intere… narrowly tailored race · nat'l origin… Intermediate substantially rel… important govt. i… gender · legitimacy Free Speech content-based: str… content-neutral: i… viewpoint discrim.… Religion Clauses Establishment: Lem… Free Exercise: neu… general laws OK Unprotected Spe… obscenity · true t… incitement · fight… defamation (limited) Substantive DP fundamental right… non-fundamental:… privacy · marriage… JUDICIAL POWER & STRUCTURE Art. III: cases & controversies only · no advisory opinions Standing (Art… Injury in fact (… + particularized… Causation · Redr… Political Que… Textually commit… another branch Baker v. Carr fa… Congress Powe… Commerce + N&… Taxing & Spen… 14th §5 enforceme… Federalism & State Power 10th Amend. anti-commandeering · Dormant CC: discriminatory =… EQUAL PROTECTION — TIER ANALYSIS 14th Amend. (states) · 5th Amend. reverse incorporation (federa… Strict (SS) Race, national or… alienage (state l… compelling + narr… Intermediate (… Gender, legitimacy important interest substantially rel… Rational Basis All other classes legitimate govt.… rationally relat… Key EP Applications Affirmative action: strict scrutiny (Grutter/Fisher) · Sex disc… FIRST AMENDMENT — FREE SPEECH most tested Con Law topic · content vs. content-neutral distinc… Content-Based Strict scrutiny Viewpoint: per se… subject-matter dis… Content-Neutral Intermediate scrut… time/place/manner alt. channels avai… Public Forums Traditional: pa… Designated · No… govt. property… Unprotected & Limited Speech Obscenity (Miller test) · Incitement (Brandenburg) · True threa… DUE PROCESS & FUNDAMENTAL RIGHTS 5th Amend. (federal) · 14th Amend. (state) · procedural + sub… Procedural DP Life · Liberty ·… Mathews balancing notice + hearing Substantive DP Fundamental righ… Non-fundamental:… Glucksberg test Fundamental R… marriage · contr… interstate trave… abortion (unsett… Takings & Contracts Clause 5th Taking: physical (per se) vs. regulatory (Penn Central) ·… ⚖ STATE ACTION · INCORPORATION · SEPARATION OF POWERS State Action required for constitutional claims (14th Amend.) · Exceptions: public function doctrine; entanglement/encouragement · Selective Incorporation: most Bill of Rights protections apply to states via 14th Amend. DP Separation of Powers: Congress may not delegate non-intelligible principles · Executive privilege (limited) · President: pardon power, veto, commander-in-chief · Non-delegation doctrine (resurgent)

← scroll to explore · hover nodes (desktop) or tap nodes (mobile) for full detail →

Contracts — NY Bar (MBE + MEE)

Hover / tap nodes for exam notes · MBE: 25 scored questions

CONTRACT FORMATION & PERFORMANCE — CORE MBE FRAMEWORK (25 SCORED QUESTIONS) UCC ARTICLE 2 — GOODS THIRD PARTIES DEFENSES TO FORMATION FORMATION offer + acceptance + consideration mutual assent required CONTRACT TERMS parol evidence rule express / implied terms conditions: precedent / subsequent PERFORMANCE substantial performance (CL) perfect tender rule (UCC) excuse: impossibility / frustration BREACH material vs. minor breach anticipatory repudiation constructive conditions REMEDIES expectation · reliance · restitution specific performance (unique goods/land) foreseeability · certainty · mitigation Offer definite terms communicated intent to be bound Acceptance mirror-image (CL) §2-207 (UCC) mailbox rule Consideration bargained-for exchange legal detriment promissory estoppel alt. Parol Evidence integrated writing exceptions apply course of dealing (UC… Conditions precedent / subseque… concurrent waiver / excuse Subst. Performance CL: substantial OK UCC: perfect tender installment K: exception Excuse / Discharge impossibility impracticability frustration of purpose Material Breach defeats bargain purpose excuses further perf. Jacob & Youngs rule Anticipatory Rep. unequivocal refusal P may sue immediately must still mitigate Expectation benefit of bargain lost profits + costs majority remedy UCC ARTICLE 2 — SALE OF GOODS applies when contract is primarily for goods (moveable, tangible property) mixed K: predominant purpose test · merchant = special duties UCC Offer / Accept. Firm Offer Rule (3 mo.) §2-207 Battle of Forms Perfect Tender Rule reject / accept / partial seller's right to cure UCC Remedies cover / market price incidental + consequenti… Warranties (UCC) Express (affirmation of fact) · Implied Merchantability (merchant seller) · Implied Fit… THIRD PARTIES third-party beneficiaries · assignment · delegation highly tested MEE topic Third-Party Beneficiary intended vs. incidental vested rights · modification Assignment & Delegation assignment: transfers rights delegation: transfers duties Novation vs. Assignment Novation: original party discharged (all-party consent required) · Assignment: assig… DEFENSES TO FORMATION contract void or voidable if defense established Statute of Frauds · Mistake · Fraud · Duress · Unconscionability Statute of Frauds MY LEGS: Marriage · Year+ Land · Executor · Goods $500+ · Surety Mistake · Fraud · Duress Mutual mistake → voidable Fraud / duress → voidable Unconscionability · Illegality · Misrepresentation Unconscionable: procedural + substantive · Illegality = void · Misrepresentation = void… ⚖ REMEDIES HIERARCHY & LIMITATIONS Expectation (benefit of bargain) → Reliance (out-of-pocket) → Restitution (unjust enrichment) · Specific Performance: unique goods or real property only Hadley v. Baxendale (foreseeability at contracting) · Certainty · P must mitigate after breach · NO punitive damages for breach of contract

← scroll to explore · hover nodes (desktop) or tap nodes (mobile) for full detail →

Criminal Law & Procedure — NY Bar (MBE + MEE)

Hover / tap nodes · MBE: 25 scored questions · NY CPL distinctions noted

CRIMINAL LAW & PROCEDURE — CASE FLOW (MBE: 25 SCORED · MEE TESTED) ELEMENTS · MENS REA · ACTUS REUS SPECIFIC CRIMES 4TH, 5TH & 6TH AMENDMENT DEFENSES · INCHOATE · ACCOMPLICE ELEMENTS OF A CRIME actus reus · mens rea causation · concurrence burden on prosecution (BRD) HOMICIDE & CRIMES murder · manslaughter robbery · burglary · arson theft · rape · assault · battery 4th AMENDMENT search & seizure · warrants probable cause · exceptions exclusionary rule · fruit of poisonous tree 5th & 6th AMENDMENTS Miranda · self-incrimination right to counsel · double jeopardy speedy trial · grand jury (5th) DEFENSES & INCHOATE self-defense · insanity attempt · conspiracy · solicitation accomplice liability · RICO Actus Reus voluntary act or… possession · sta… no act, no crime Mens Rea (MPC) purpose · knowle… recklessness · n… strict liability… Causation actual (but-for) proximate (fores… intervening cause Murder 1°: premeditated… 2°: intent to kil… felony murder rule Manslaughter voluntary: adequa… provocation (heat… involuntary: crimi… Search & Se… REP (Katz): subje… + objective reaso… third-party doctri… Warrant Excepti… consent · plain v… exigent · SITA ·… Terry stop · inven… Miranda Rights custody + interro… right to remain s… right to counsel Double Jeopardy same offense (Blo… jeopardy attaches: jury sworn / first… Self-Defense reasonable belief… imminent harm no duty to retreat… Inchoate Crimes attempt · conspir… solicitation merger doctrine 6th Amend. counsel · spe… jury · confro… compulsory pro… ELEMENTS & MPC MENTAL STATES MPC §2.02: purpose · knowledge · recklessness · negligence Purpose / Know… purpose: consciou… knowledge: aware… Recklessness /… reckless: conscio… neg.: should be a… Strict Liabil… no mens rea requ… statutory rape ·… Common Law vs. MPC Common law intent: general (awareness) vs. specific (purpose +… SPECIFIC CRIMES — DETAIL felony murder · robbery · burglary · theft offenses Felony Murder death during inher… dangerous felony (… Robbery &… robbery: larceny +… burglary: B&E… Theft Offens… larceny · embez… false pretenses… Rape, Assault, Battery & Arson Rape: non-consensual intercourse · Assault: attempt/apprehensio… 4th AMENDMENT — SEARCH & SEIZURE Katz REP test · probable cause · exclusionary rule Probable Cause fair probability c… or evidence of cri… Warrant Except… ESCAPPE: exigent ·… consent · plain vi… Exclusionary… fruit of poison… good faith exce… Exclusionary Rule — Exceptions Good faith: officer relied on facially valid warrant · Independ… DEFENSES & INCHOATE CRIMES affirmative defenses · specific vs. general intent Insanity Defe… M'Naghten: didn't… nature or wrongfu… Attempt specific intent +… subst. step (MPC)… Conspiracy agreement + o… Pinkerton lia… Other Defenses & Accomplice Liability Duress: imminent threat of death/serious bodily harm · Nece… ⚖ NY CPL DISTINCTIONS · ARRAIGNMENT · PLEA BARGAINING · SENTENCING NY CPL: felony complaint → preliminary hearing or grand jury (≥ 16 jurors; 12 vote to indict) → indictment → arraignment → trial Speedy trial: NY CPL §30.30 — prosecution ready by: 6 months (felony), 90 days (misd.), 30 days (violation) Miranda: custody = formal arrest or freedom of movement curtailed to degree of arrest · Invocation: unambiguous request for counsel or silence · Waiver: knowing + voluntary NY: indelible right to counsel attaches when attorney enters case (broader than federal)

← scroll to explore · hover nodes (desktop) or tap nodes (mobile) for full detail →

Evidence — NY Bar (MBE + NY CPLR)

Hover / tap nodes · MBE: 25 scored questions · FRE governs MBE · NY distinctions noted

EVIDENCE — ADMISSIBILITY FRAMEWORK (MBE: 25 SCORED · FRE GOVERNS) RELEVANCE · CHARACTER · POLICY HEARSAY — DEFINITION & EXEMPTIONS HEARSAY EXCEPTIONS (FRE 803/804) WITNESSES · PRIVILEGES · AUTHENTICATION RELEVANCE logical relevance (FRE 401) legal relevance (FRE 403) character · habit · policy CHARACTER & POLICY FRE 404/405: propensity bar FRE 407–411: policy exclusions MIMIC · rape shield · habit HEARSAY out-of-court statement offered to prove truth of matter exemptions · prior statements · admissions HEARSAY EXCEPTIONS FRE 803: availability immaterial FRE 804: declarant unavailable FRE 807: residual exception WITNESSES & PRIVILEGES competence · impeachment A/C · spousal · physician authentication · best evidence FRE 401/403 relevant: any te… to make fact mor… probable (of cons… 403 Balancing exclude if proba… value substantia… outweighed by pre… Policy Exclus… 407: subseq. re… 408: settlements 409: medical pay… FRE 404 — Chara… no propensity evi… criminal D: may o… victim's character… Habit & Rap… FRE 406: habit ad… (specific routine… FRE 412: rape shie… Not Hearsay verbal acts · eff… listener · legall… words · circumstan… FRE 801(d) Exem… prior inconsisten… prior consistent… party admissions ·… FRE 803 Excepti… present sense · e… utterance · menta… medical · business… FRE 804 (Unavai… former testimony dying declaration stmt against intere… Confrontation… Crawford: testim… stmts require co… non-testimonial:… Impeachment BICCC: bias · inc… convictions · cha… contradiction · ca… Privileges A/C · work pro… spousal · phys… therapist · cle… RELEVANCE, CHARACTER & POLICY FRE 401: any tendency · FRE 403: substantially outweighed MIMIC (FRE 404… Motive · Intent ·… Identity · Common… FRE 405 Methods reputation / opin… specific acts: on… 407–411 subsequent reme… settlements · l… Character Evidence — Criminal vs. Civil Criminal D may offer own good character (opens door for prosecu… HEARSAY — DEFINITION & EXEMPTIONS FRE 801: out-of-court statement offered for truth of the matter Non-Hearsay Us… verbal act (legall… effect on listener… Party Admissio… 801(d)(2): own sta… vicarious · co-con… Prior Statem… 801(d)(1): prio… (under oath) ·… Hearsay Analysis Flowchart Is it a statement? (assertion) → Was it made out of court? → Is… HEARSAY EXCEPTIONS — FRE 803 & 804 FRE 803: declarant need NOT be unavailable · FRE 804: requires… 803 — Key Exce… present sense · ex… mental/physical st… 803 — Records business records (… public records · l… 804 Excepti… former testimo… dying declarat… Unavailability (FRE 804) & Residual (807) Unavailable: privilege · refusal · lack of memory · death/illne… WITNESSES, PRIVILEGES & AUTHENTICATION competence · opinion evidence · best evidence rule Impeachment FRE 609: prior co… FRE 613: prior in… Opinion Eviden… lay: rationally b… expert: Daubert ·… Authenticat… 901: evidence… to support fin… Privileges & Best Evidence Rule A/C privilege: confidential comms + legal advice + not waived… ⚖ NY CPLR DISTINCTIONS · JUDICIAL NOTICE · BURDENS OF PROOF NY Evidence: follows common law generally + CPLR provisions · No codified rules equivalent to FRE · Hearsay analysis similar but NY recognizes fewer exceptions NY prior inconsistent statement: admissible to impeach, not as substantive evidence (unlike FRE 801(d)(1)(A)) Judicial notice (FRE 201): adjudicative facts — accurate and not subject to reasonable dispute · Burdens: production (threshold showing) vs. persuasion (BRD crim.; preponderance or C&C evidence civil) Presumptions: FRE 301 — shift production burden only · NY: some shift persuasion burden

← scroll to explore · hover nodes (desktop) or tap nodes (mobile) for full detail →

Family Law — NY Bar (MEE + NY)

Hover / tap nodes · NY Domestic Relations Law (DRL) · NY Family Court Act

FAMILY LAW — MARRIAGE THROUGH CHILD SUPPORT (MEE SUBJECT · NY DRL) MARRIAGE & ANNULMENT DIVORCE & PROPERTY DIVISION CUSTODY & VISITATION SUPPORT · ADOPTION · PATERNITY MARRIAGE valid marriage requirements void vs. voidable common law · NY rules DIVORCE grounds · no-fault (NY 2010) equitable distribution · NY separation · annulment CUSTODY best interests of child legal vs. physical custody UCCJEA jurisdiction SUPPORT child support · spousal NY CSSA formula modification · UIFSA ADOPTION & PATERNITY termination of parental rights voluntary · involuntary paternity · ART · surrogacy Valid Marriage capacity · conse… no impediment solemnization (NY) Void vs. Void… void: bigamy · i… voidable: fraud… age · mental inca… Common Law Ma… agreement + coha… + holding out as… NY: does NOT reco… Grounds for Div… NY: no-fault (DRL… irretrievable bre… ≥ 6 months (2010) Equitable Distr… marital vs. separ… NY DRL §236B fact… not necessarily 50… Best Interests… primary standard NY: 10+ factors (… no presumption for… Legal vs. Physi… legal: decision-m… physical: residen… joint or sole UCCJEA home state: 6 mo… priority jurisdi… emergency excepti… Child Support (… CSSA formula: % of combined parental… through age 21 (NY) Spousal Mainten… NY: pendente lite… post-divorce: 14… DRL §236B(6) Termination TPR voluntary surren… involuntary: neg… abandonment · inc… Paternity marital presump… DNA testing · A… NY Family Court… MARRIAGE, ANNULMENT & PREMARITAL NY DRL §§ 5, 6, 7 · void ab initio vs. voidable distinctions Void Marriages bigamy: prior val… incest: consangui… Voidable Marri… age under 18 · fr… duress · mental i… Premarital Ag… enforceable if:… voluntary + full… NY Marriage Requirements NY DRL §§ 11–13: license required (24-hr waiting period) · sole… DIVORCE & PROPERTY DIVISION NY DRL §236B · equitable distribution state · 13 statutory fact… Marital Proper… acquired during ma… (except gifts/inhe… Separate Prope… pre-marital · gift… personal injury re… Transmutation separate → mari… commingled or t… NY DRL §236B Equitable Distribution Factors Income/property of each party · Duration of marriage · Age/heal… CUSTODY, VISITATION & MODIFICATION NY: no tender years presumption · courts favor frequent/continu… BIC Factors (N… stability · parent… child's wishes · D… Visitation Rig… noncustodial paren… grandparent visita… Modification substantial cha… circumstances r… Relocation & Parental Alienation Relocation (Tropea v. Tropea): totality of circumstances — reas… SUPPORT, ADOPTION & PATERNITY NY CSSA · DRL §236B · Family Court Act · UIFSA CSSA Formula 1 child: 17% · 2:… 3: 29% · 4: 31% ·… Adoption TPR + consent of… (14+) · home study Paternity marital presu… DNA testing Modification & Enforcement Child support: substantial change in circumstances OR 3-yea… ⚖ NY KEY DISTINCTIONS · DOMESTIC VIOLENCE · ORDERS OF PROTECTION NY DRL §240: custody · NY Domestic Relations Law §170: 7 grounds for divorce incl. no-fault (2010) · NY Family Court Act §812: family offenses jurisdiction · Orders of protection: Family Court or Criminal Court · DVPA protections Fault grounds (NY): cruel & inhuman treatment · abandonment (1 yr) · imprisonment (3 yrs) · adultery · living apart pursuant to separation decree/agreement (1 yr) · irretrievable breakdown (1 yr) ART/Surrogacy: NY Child-Parent Security Act (2020) — gestational surrogacy agreements enforceable

← scroll to explore · hover nodes (desktop) or tap nodes (mobile) for full detail →

MPT — Multistate Performance Test (NY Bar)

Hover / tap nodes · 2 tasks · 90 min each · NY Bar includes MPT · Task-type approach guide

MPT — MULTISTATE PERFORMANCE TEST · 6 TASK TYPES · APPROACH & STRATEGY APPROACH & FILE NAVIGATION OBJECTIVE MEMO & PERSUASIVE BRIEF CONTRACTS · LETTERS · PLANS SCORING & TIME MANAGEMENT MPT OVERVIEW 2 tasks · 90 min each File + Library provided no outside knowledge needed TASK MEMO FIRST read task memo before File identify: task type + format scope · audience · tone TASK TYPES 1–2 objective memo persuasive brief / motion most commonly tested TASK TYPES 3–6 contract/agreement draft client letter · negotiation plan closing argument · will/trust SCORING & STRATEGY 20% of NY Bar score format compliance critical use only File + Library The File task memo · inst… client docs · in… contracts · corre… The Library cases · statutes… rules of evidenc… controlling autho… Universal App… 1. Read task memo 2. Skim library… 3. Read file → 4.… Task Memo Sign… "prepare a memo"… "draft a brief" →… scope: issues to a… Firm Instructi… format guidelines… structure / citat… ALWAYS follow these Objective Memo neutral analysis both sides · pred… IRAC per issue Persuasive Brief one-sided advocacy statement of fact… point headings req… Closing Argu… persuasive + n… address weakne… oral presentati… Contract Draft use model in File… fill gaps using L… precise language c… Client Letter plain language (n… practical advice… empathetic but pre… Time Budget 10 min: read tas… 30 min: read + a… 50 min: outline +… Scoring Criteria format · thorough… use of facts + law reasoning quality UNIVERSAL MPT APPROACH Step-by-step method for all 6 task types Step 1: Task M… identify task, fo… scope of issues;… Steps 2–3: Read skim library titl… file carefully; a… Steps 4–6: Wr… outline; draft p… check format; pr… Reading the Library: Case Hierarchy Controlling vs. persuasive authority: cases from the MPT's fict… OBJECTIVE MEMO & PERSUASIVE BRIEF most frequently tested · format and tone are the key differenti… Memo Format TO/FROM/DATE/RE he… issue → rule → app… Brief Format caption · statemen… argument w/ point… Point Headin… complete senten… legal conclusio… Objective vs. Persuasive: Key Differences Objective memo: "The court will likely find…" / "The evidence s… OTHER TASK TYPES 3–6 contract drafting · client letter · negotiation memo · closing… Negotiation Pl… client's interests… BATNA · leverage ·… Document Draft… will clause · cont… statutory complian… Jury Instruc… plain language… accurate statem… Client Letter — Approach Audience: non-lawyer client — avoid legalese · Structure: greet… SCORING, COMMON ERRORS & TIPS 20% of NY Bar score · graded holistically · format matters… Common Errors wrong format/tone ignoring task ins… Fact Integrat… use specific fact… apply each rule Library Use cite by case… statute secti… High-Value Scoring Habits ✓ Follow firm memo format instructions exactly · ✓ Use head… ⚖ MPT TASK TYPE IDENTIFIER · IRAC TEMPLATE · POINT HEADING FORMULA Task Type Signals: "prepare a memo" → objective | "draft brief/motion" → persuasive | "draft letter to client" → client-friendly "draft contract/will" → operative language | "draft discovery" → discovery focus | "draft jury instruction" → instruction format Point heading formula: [PARTY] [SHOULD/IS ENTITLED TO] [RESULT] BECAUSE [LEGAL STANDARD] AND [KEY FACTS] IRAC: Issue (frame precisely) → Rule (quote or closely paraphrase from Library) → Application (use specific File facts — the more the better) → Conclusion (clear, definitive) NY Bar MPT weight: 2 tasks × ~10% each = ~20% of total score

← scroll to explore · hover nodes (desktop) or tap nodes (mobile) for full detail →

MPT — 8 Task Type Examples & Annotated Guides

Click / tap any card · full annotated example fills the page · close with × or tap outside

OBJECTIVE MEMO neutral · balanced · IRAC Predict outcome honestly TO / FROM / DATE / RE header Present both sides Most commonly tested type TAP / CLICK FOR FULL EXAMPLE PERSUASIVE BRIEF advocate · point headings Argue zealously for client Bold point heading per issue Request specific relief 2nd most common type TAP / CLICK FOR FULL EXAMPLE CLOSING ARGUMENT jury · narrative · plain language Open with theme sentence Tell the story of the facts No legalese — plain language Ask explicitly for verdict TAP / CLICK FOR FULL EXAMPLE CONTRACT DRAFT operative words · defined terms Follow model form exactly "shall" = mandatory obligation Define terms on first use Fill every blank TAP / CLICK FOR FULL EXAMPLE CLIENT LETTER plain language · no jargon Explain law simply No case citations Always give a recommendation Concrete next steps + deadline TAP / CLICK FOR FULL EXAMPLE NEGOTIATION MEMO goals · BATNA · strategy Rank client priorities BATNA drives resistance point Plan concession order Internal memo — not filed TAP / CLICK FOR FULL EXAMPLE DOCUMENT DRAFT will · trust · settlement Use model form from File Fill every blank — zero left Include execution formalities Mandatory provisions first TAP / CLICK FOR FULL EXAMPLE JURY INSTRUCTION elements · plain language List every element Define each in plain words State burden + verdict form Address jury as "you" TAP / CLICK FOR FULL EXAMPLE

← scroll to explore · hover nodes (desktop) or tap nodes (mobile) for full detail →

NY Practice (CPLR) — NY Bar Exam

Hover / tap nodes · CPLR · NY-only subject · Jurisdiction through appeals

NY PRACTICE (CPLR) — JURISDICTION THROUGH APPEALS · NY-ONLY BAR EXAM SUBJECT JURISDICTION & VENUE PLEADINGS & PARTIES DISCLOSURE & MOTIONS TRIAL · JUDGMENT · APPEALS JURISDICTION SMJ · subject matter personal jurisdiction CPLR §301–§302 long arm COMMENCING ACTION filing (not service) = commencement service of process · SOL CPLR §304 · §306-b PLEADINGS complaint · answer · reply CPLR Art. 3 · notice pleading Bill of particulars · amendments DISCLOSURE depositions · interrogatories document requests · physical exam CPLR Art. 31 · full disclosure JUDGMENTS & APPEALS SJ · default · JNOV Appellate Division · COA CPLR §5501 · appeal as of right NY Court Syst… Supreme Ct: unli… Civil Ct: ≤$25k… Family · Surrogat… Long Arm (§30… transacts busine… commits tort in/… owns/uses NY prop… Venue (CPLR §… county of reside… place of occurre… change of venue (… Filing (§304) action commences… filing with count… tolls SOL immediat… Service of Pro… personal (§308(1)) nail & mail (… 120 days after fil… Complaint/Answer notice pleading s… answer: 20/30 days CPLR §3012 · §3018 Bill of Particu… amplifies pleadin… CPLR §3041 binding at trial Parties joinder · clas… intervention ·… CPLR Art. 10 Depositions (§3… oral · written notice: 20 days non-party: subpoen… Key Motions §3211 dismiss ·… §3025 amendment preliminary injun… Summary Judgme… no triable issue… 120 days after no… CPLR §3212 Appeal Routes Sup.Ct.→App.Div.→… 30-day notice of… CPLR §5513 JURISDICTION & VENUE — DETAIL CPLR §301 (gen. jurisdiction) · §302 (long arm) · §503 (venue) General PJ (§3… domicile in NY incorporated in NY Long Arm §302 transaction of bu… tortious act in NY Venue Change wrong county (§5… convenience (§51… SOL & Tolling Provisions Key NY SOLs: Personal injury/property damage: 3 years · Medical… PLEADINGS, PARTIES & SERVICE CPLR Art. 3 · Art. 10 · §3012 answer deadlines · §306-b service Answer Deadlin… 20 days (personal… 30 days (other met… Affirmative De… must be in answer or waived (§3018(b… Third-Party… impleader: cont… indemnification… CPLR §3211 Motion to Dismiss Grounds (1) Defense based on documentary evidence · (2) Lack of legal c… DISCLOSURE & PRE-TRIAL MOTIONS CPLR Art. 31 · "full disclosure" standard · §3212 SJ · prelimin… Scope of Discl… material & nec… in prosecution/def… Physical/Menta… in controversy + g… CPLR §3121 Prelim. Inju… likelihood of s… irrep. harm · b… Privileges & Work Product in NY NY CPLR §3101(c): attorney work product absolutely protected ·… TRIAL, JUDGMENT & APPEALS CPLR Art. 41 (jury) · Art. 52 (enforcement) · Art. 55 (appe… Jury Trial (§… demand within not… or waived; 6-pers… Post-Verdict… JNOV (§4404): set… new trial · addit… Enforcement income execut… property exec… NY Appellate Structure & Standards Supreme Court → Appellate Division (4 Depts) → Court of App… ⚖ NY COURT STRUCTURE · KEY CPLR DEADLINES · PROVISIONAL REMEDIES NY courts: Court of Claims (claims against state) · Family Court · Surrogate's Court · Supreme Court (Art. VI §7: unlimited SMJ) · Appellate Division (4 depts) · Court of Appeals (7 judges) Small Claims: NYC Civil Ct ≤$10k; Town/Village Justice Ct ≤$3k · Key deadlines: Serve within 120 days of filing (§306-b) · Answer: 20/30 days · SJ motion: within 120 days of filing note of issue Provisional remedies (CPLR Art. 62–65): Attachment (§6201) · Injunction (§6301) · Receivership (§6401) · Notice of pendency (§6501 — lis pendens, real property only) · CPLR §3012-a: certificate of merit in medical malpractice CPLR §1601: NY CPLR Article 16 — limited joint/several liability for non-economic damages above 50% at fault

← scroll to explore · hover nodes (desktop) or tap nodes (mobile) for full detail →

Professional Responsibility — NY Bar (MPRE + NY Rules)

Hover / tap nodes · ABA Model Rules + NY Rules of Professional Conduct · MPRE tested

PROFESSIONAL RESPONSIBILITY — DUTIES THROUGH DISCIPLINE (MPRE · NY RULES OF PROF. CONDUCT) CONFIDENTIALITY & A-C PRIVILEGE CONFLICTS OF INTEREST DUTIES TO CLIENTS & COURT FEES · ADVERTISING · DISCIPLINE CONFIDENTIALITY duty not to disclose client information MR 1.6 · NY Rule 1.6 CONFLICTS OF INTEREST current · former · third-party concurrent representation MR 1.7–1.9 · imputation DUTIES TO CLIENTS competence · diligence communication · loyalty MR 1.1–1.4 · fiduciary DUTIES TO COURT candor · no false statements no frivolous claims · fairness MR 3.1–3.9 · prosecutors FEES & DISCIPLINE reasonable fees · fee sharing advertising · solicitation discipline · misconduct Scope of Duty all information… to representation broader than A-C… Exceptions (M… prevent death/SBH prevent financia… defend self · cou… A-C Privilege confidential com… in course of rep. crime-fraud excep… Current Confli… directly adverse material limitati… consentable vs. not Former Clients substantially rel… matters test (MR… loyalty survives r… Competence (MR… legal knowledge ·… thoroughness · pr… can acquire by stu… Communication keep client infor… respond to inquir… client makes obj.… Termination mandatory vs. permissive wit… protect client… Candor (MR 3.3) no false statemen… law or fact to tr… duty to correct fa… Fairness (MR 3… no obstruct evide… no false evidence no paying witnesses Fees (MR 1.5) reasonable fee f… contingency: wri… fee splitting (MR… Advertising (MR… true · not mislea… NY: 3-yr file ret… solicitation restri… CONFIDENTIALITY & A-C PRIVILEGE MR 1.6 · broader than privilege · NY Rule 1.6 differences Duty vs. Privi… duty: ethical obl… privilege: eviden… Future Crime/F… MR: MAY disclose… prevent death/SBH NY Distinction NY Rule 1.6: SHA… disclose to prev… A-C Privilege Elements & Exceptions A-C privilege: (1) attorney-client relationship; (2) confidenti… CONFLICTS OF INTEREST — DETAIL MR 1.7 current · MR 1.9 former · MR 1.10 imputation Consentable COI reasonable to beli… represent + inform… Imputation (MR… conflict of one la… conflict of entire… Screening (N… timely screen c… cure lateral hi… Non-Consentable Conflicts & Special Situations Non-consentable (MR 1.7(b)(3)): suing two current clients again… DUTIES TO CLIENTS & COURT MR 1.1–1.4 (clients) · MR 3.1–3.5 (tribunal) · prosecutors Zealous Advoca… within bounds of l… no frivolous claim… Client Perjury counsel: remonstra… → withdraw → discl… Prosecutors seek justice, n… convictions (MR… Client Control vs. Lawyer Control Client decides: objectives of representation; pleas; settlement… FEES, ADVERTISING & DISCIPLINE MR 1.5 · MR 7.1–7.3 · MR 8.3 · NY specific rules Contingency F… must be in writing no criminal/famil… Reporting (MR… shall report subs… ethical violations Discipline disbarment ·… censure · rep… Client Property & Trust Accounts IOLA/IOLTA accounts: client funds must be kept separate fro… ⚖ NY vs. MODEL RULES KEY DISTINCTIONS · MPRE FREQUENCY CHART NY Rule 1.6: SHALL disclose to prevent reasonably certain death/substantial bodily harm (MR: MAY) · NY Rule 1.7: same structure as MR but "differing interests" standard · NY permits screening for lateral hires (MR 1.10) NY requires written retainer for fees over $3,000 in non-criminal matters · NY Rule 7.1: no false/misleading communication (similar to MR) MPRE high-frequency: Confidentiality exceptions · Conflict analysis (1.7/1.8/1.9) · Candor to tribunal (3.3) · Client perjury protocol · Competence · Fees (reasonableness, contingency) · Reporting misconduct (8.3) Advertising/solicitation Client property rules · Prosecutorial duties (3.8)

← scroll to explore · hover nodes (desktop) or tap nodes (mobile) for full detail →

Real Property — NY Bar (MBE + NY)

Hover / tap nodes · Estates · Landlord-Tenant · Conveyancing · Mortgages · Servitudes

REAL PROPERTY — ESTATES THROUGH MORTGAGES (MBE HIGH-FREQUENCY · NY RPL) FREEHOLD ESTATES & FUTURE INTERESTS LANDLORD-TENANT CONVEYANCING & RECORDING MORTGAGES · SERVITUDES · ADVERSE POSS. FREEHOLD ESTATES FSA · FSD · FSSCS · FSSEL life estate · fee tail future interests · RAP CONCURRENT OWNERSHIP joint tenancy · tenancy in common tenancy by entirety partition · severance LANDLORD-TENANT leasehold estates · duties IWH · quiet enjoyment eviction · NY RPL protections CONVEYANCING contract of sale · deed recording acts · title NY: race-notice statute MORTGAGES & LIENS creation · priority foreclosure · deficiency easements · covenants · AP Defeasible Fe… FSD: "so long as" FSSCS: "but if" FSSEL → executory… Life Estate pur autre vie waste: voluntary permissive · amel… RAP vest within LIB… contingent rem.… NY USRAP: 90-yr w… Joint Tenancy 4 unities: TTIP right of survivor… severed by conveya… Tenancy by Ent… spouses only cannot unilateral… creditor protectio… Leasehold Types term of years · p… at will · at suff… NY: holdover → per… IWH & Quiet… IWH: habitable co… constructive evic… NY: strong tenant… Transfer of… assignment: fu… sublease: part… privity of K vs… Deed Types general warranty special warranty… 6 covenants of tit… Recording Acts race · notice · r… NY: race-notice BFP: value + no no… Mortgage lien theory (NY) equitable redemp… foreclosure: judi… Easements express · implied… prescriptive ease… appurtenant vs. in… FREEHOLD ESTATES — CLASSIFICATION FSA · FSD · FSSCS · FSSEL · Life Estate · Fee Tail FSA absolute ownership no conditions or… Life Estate Wa… voluntary: affirm… permissive: negle… Concurrent Ow… JT: 4 unities re… TIC: presumption… Defeasible Fee Identification Chart FSD: "so long as / while / during / until" → Possibility of Rev… LANDLORD-TENANT — NY RPL NY Real Property Law · Rent stabilization · IWH · eviction Landlord Duties IWH: deliver &… quiet enjoyment Tenant Remedies repair & deduc… withhold · termina… Eviction (NY) summary proceed… RPAPL § 711 gro… NY Rent Regulation & Constructive Eviction NY Rent Stabilization: NYC buildings 6+ units built before 1974… CONVEYANCING & RECORDING ACTS NY Real Property Law · race-notice statute · BFP analysis Contract of Sa… statute of frauds equitable conversi… Deed Requireme… writing · grantor… description · deli… BFP (NY) value + no actu… notice + record… NY Race-Notice & Types of Notice NY RPL §291: race-notice — subsequent purchaser wins if: (1) ta… MORTGAGES · EASEMENTS · COVENANTS NY lien theory · equitable redemption · running covenants Mortgage Prio… first to record w… subrogation · PMSI Running Coven… touch & conce… privity · notice… Adverse Po… OCEAN: open ·… exclusive · a… Easement Creation & Adverse Possession (NY) Easement by necessity: landlocked parcel after division · E… ⚖ RECORDING ACT ANALYSIS · COVENANT RUNNING · MORTGAGE FORECLOSURE Recording Act Types: Race — first to record wins (no notice required) · Notice — BFP without notice of prior conveyance wins (even if records later) · Race-Notice (NY RPL §291) — must be BFP without notice AND record first Covenant running at law: touch & concern + intent + privity (horizontal for burden; vertical for both) · Equitable servitude: intent + touch & concern + notice (no privity required) NY Mortgage Foreclosure: judicial foreclosure only (no power of sale) · Mortgagor has right of redemption until foreclosure sale · Deficiency judgment: available unless waived Equitable redemption: right to pay off and redeem before final foreclosure · Statutory redemption: NY does not have post-sale statutory redemption 6 deed covenants: seisin, right to convey, against encumbrances, quiet enjoyment, warranty, further assurances

← scroll to explore · hover nodes (desktop) or tap nodes (mobile) for full detail →

Grantor's Future Interest in Present Estate — Property Law (Bar Focus)

Hover / tap nodes · Each column: present estate → grantor's retained interest · NY EPTL · RAP status

PRESENT FREEHOLD ESTATE TYPE — GRANTOR'S RETAINED FUTURE INTEREST — RAP STATUS (BAR EXAM · NY EPTL) FSA — NO GRANTOR INTEREST FSD — POSSIBILITY OF REVERTER FSSCS — RIGHT OF ENTRY FSSEL — NO GRANTOR INTEREST LIFE/TERM — REVERSION FEE SIMPLE ABSOLUTE “to A” · “to A and his heirs” no conditions · infinite duration largest possible estate in land FEE SIMPLE DETERMINABLE “so long as · while · during · until” auto-terminates on condition breach durational limiting language required FEE SIMPLE SUBJECT TO CONDITION SUBSEQUENT “but if · on condition that · provided that” grantor must elect to terminate conditional language required FEE SIMPLE SUBJECT TO EXECUTORY LIMITATION “but if X, then to B” divests to third party B, not grantor executory interest in B · subject to RAP LIFE ESTATE / TERM OF YEARS “to A for life” · “to A for 10 years” limited / finite duration estate grantor conveys less than full estate held NO FUTURE INTEREST IN GRANTOR grantor conveys full ownership — nothing retained no reversion · no reverter · no right of entry POSSIBILITY OF REVERTER automatically retained by grantor O breach → property auto-reverts to O vested · NOT subject to RAP RIGHT OF ENTRY (POWER OF TERMINATION) grantor O must affirmatively act to reclaim vested · NOT subject to RAP NO GRANTOR INTEREST RETAINED interest flows to third party B instead B: shifting executory interest · subject to RAP REVERSION arises automatically when grantor conveys less than full estate held always vested · NOT subject to RAP COUNTER- INFERENCE Why No Interest? grantor conveys full fee nothing left to retain no condition / no limit Bar Example “O to A.” A: FSA O retains NOTHING Mechanism breach → auto-revert no O action needed SOL runs from breach Bar Example “to A so long as used for school” O: Possibility of Reverter Mechanism breach → O must act re-enter or sue fee continues until then Bar Example “to A, but if not for school, O may re-enter” → Right of Entry B’s Interest shifting executory interest in B subject to RAP! Bar Example “to A, but if not for school, to B” O retains NOTHING Arises By Law automatically — no express grant needed NOT subject to RAP Bar Example “to A for life” A: life estate O: reversion (vested) RAP: N/A — No Grantor Interest FSA leaves no future interest to analyze Exam: if language is ambiguous → courts prefer FSA NY: “to A” alone creates FSA (EPTL §6-1.1) RAP: Does NOT Apply Possibility of Reverter is vested in grantor O ascertained person at moment of creation NY: freely alienable inter vivos · inheritable RAP: Does NOT Apply Right of Entry is vested in grantor O NY: alienable inter vivos (EPTL §6-4.6) — minority rule Most states: NOT inter vivos alienable (personal to grantor) RAP: Applies to B’s Interest! Executory interests ARE subject to RAP B’s interest must vest within LIB + 21 years NY: wait-and-see up to 90 years (EPTL §9-1.1) RAP: Does NOT Apply Reversion always vested in ascertained grantor O Alienable inter vivos · devisable · descendable Eliminated only by creating remainder filling the gap ⚖ GRANTOR-RETAINED INTERESTS — ALL VESTED, NONE SUBJECT TO RAP: Reversion · Possibility of Reverter · Right of Entry (Power of Termination) KEY DISTINCTION: FSD ends automatically · FSSCS requires grantor to act · FSSEL gives executory interest to third party B (RAP applies to B) · FSA and FSSEL: grantor retains nothing

← scroll to explore · hover nodes (desktop) or tap nodes (mobile) for full detail →

Hearsay Exceptions — The Admissibility Pyramid

Work up the pyramid · first qualifying tier admits the evidence · hover or tap any node · FRE 801–807 & NY

HEARSAY ADMISSIBILITY PYRAMID — FRE 801–807 — START AT BASE, WORK UP ANALYSIS DIRECTION ↑ HEARSAY DEFINED — FRE 801(c) out-of-court statement • by a declarant • offered to prove truth of matter asserted • all 3 elements required TIER 1 — NOT OFFERED FOR TRUTH Not hearsay at all — no exception needed verbal acts • effect on listener • operative words • circumstantial state of mind • verbal parts of act EXAMPLES: “I accept” (contract) • “Danger: Wet Floor” (notice) • “I am Napoleon” (insanity, not for truth) • dog leading police (not a statement) TIER 2 — FRE 801(d) NOT HEARSAY BY DEFINITION Defined out of hearsay entirely — admissible as substantive evidence 801(d)(1) Prior Witness Statements PIS under oath • PCS • ID 801(d)(2)(A)–(C) Party Admissions own stmt • adoptive • authorized 801(d)(2)(D)–(E) Vicarious Admits agent/employee • co-conspirator TIER 3 — FRE 803: DECLARANT AVAILABILITY IMMATERIAL (23 EXCEPTIONS) Declarant need NOT be unavailable — sufficient indicia of reliability substitute for cross-examination 803(1) Present Sense Impression 803(2) Excited Utterance 803(3) State of Mind Hillmon doctrine 803(4) Medical Diag/Treatment 803(5) Past Recoll. Recorded 803(6) Business Records 803(8) Public Records 803(11–13) Records of Vital Stats 803(16) Ancient Documents 803(17) Market Reports / Lists 803(18) Learned Treatises ★ NY 803(19–21) Reputation Char / Prop / Hist 803(11–13) Religious / Personal Records ★ NY: No PSI 803(1) not adopted in New York TIER 4 — FRE 804: DECLARANT MUST BE UNAVAILABLE Privilege • Refuses despite order • No memory • Death/illness • Absent & cannot procure 804(b)(1) Former Testimony opp & motive to develop 804(b)(2) Dying Declaration FRE: homicide & civil ★ NY: all 804(b)(3) Stmt vs. Interest penal corroboration req. 804(b)(6) Forfeiture by Wrongdoing 804(b)(4) Personal / Family History (rare) APEX — FRE 807: RESIDUAL (CATCHALL) Equivalent trustworthiness • Material fact • More probative than alternatives Interests of justice • Pre-trial notice required Courts apply sparingly — not a general escape hatch from FRE 803/804 “Near miss” problem: some courts deny 807 if statement almost qualifies under 803/804 but fails one element CRAWFORD SHIELD 6th Amendment Confrontation Clause TESTIMONIAL hearsay against crim. defendant = BLOCKED unless: ✓ Declarant unavailable ✓ Prior opp. to cross Davis test: ongoing emergency = non-testimonial overrides even valid exceptions in criminal cases NY BAR DISTINCTIONS ★ No PSI (803(1)) NY only has EU ★ Dying Decl: ALL crimes (not just homicide) ★ No 803(18) Learned Treatise impeach only ★ Crawford applies equally in NY crim. courts CPLR 4518 biz records ~ 803(6) ← ADMITTED ← ADMITTED ← ADMITTED ← ADMITTED EXCLUDED if no tier qualifies T5 T4 T3 T2 T1 MNEMONIC: Work up the pyramid — T1 Not For Truth • T2 801(d) Exemptions • T3 FRE 803 (available) • T4 FRE 804 (unavailable) • T5 FRE 807 Residual • Crawford Shield (criminal cases)

← scroll to explore · hover nodes (desktop) or tap nodes (mobile) for full detail →

Remedies — NY Bar (MEE Cross-Cutting)

Hover / tap nodes · Damages · Equity · Restitution · Injunctions · Constructive Trust

REMEDIES — DAMAGES · EQUITABLE RELIEF · RESTITUTION · INJUNCTIONS (MEE CROSS-CUTTING) CONTRACT DAMAGES EQUITABLE REMEDIES RESTITUTION & UNJUST ENRICHMENT TORT DAMAGES & INJUNCTIONS CONTRACT DAMAGES expectation · reliance · rest… Hadley foreseeability mitigation · certainty EQUITABLE REMEDIES specific performance · injunction rescission · reformation inadequate legal remedy required RESTITUTION unjust enrichment · quasi-contract constructive trust · equitable lien measure: D's gain, not P's loss TORT DAMAGES compensatory: special + general punitive · nominal NY: no cap on non-economic INJUNCTIONS TRO · preliminary · permanent 4-part test · bond required NY CPLR §6301 Expectation benefit of the b… put P where K pe… loss − cost avoid… Reliance out-of-pocket ex… restore pre-K po… promissory estopp… Hadley Limits foreseeable at K… general: natural… special: communic… Specific Perfo… unique subject ma… real property: al… NOT: personal serv… Rescission/Ref… rescission: undo… reformation: rewr… mutual mistake · f… Quasi-Contract implied-in-law co… benefit conferred… unjust to retain w… Constructive Tr… D acquired proper… P can trace the p… defeats D's credit… Accounting disgorgement o… fiduciary brea… D's gain not P'… Compensatory special: medical,… general: pain &am… loss of consortium Punitive Damag… malice · wanton r… NOT mere negligen… NY: conscious disr… TRO ex parte · urgent immediate irrepa… 14 days (FRCP) Permanent Inj. full merits win r… balance of hardsh… public interest CONTRACT DAMAGES — THREE MEASURES expectation · reliance · restitution · UCC Article 2 Formula loss in value + o… − cost avoided −… Mitigation P must take reaso… lost volume selle… Certainty Lim… reasonable certa… new business: sp… UCC §2 Buyer & Seller Remedies Buyer: Cover §2-712 (cover price − K price); Market §2-713; SP §2-7… Seller: Resale §2-706; Market §2-708(1); Lost profits §2-708(2); Pr… EQUITABLE REMEDIES — WHEN & HOW inadequate legal remedy · laches · unclean hands SP — Available real property (alw… unique goods · rar… SP — NOT Avail. personal service c… 13th Amendment bar Equit. Defen… laches · unclea… hardship · impo… Rescission vs. Reformation Rescission: grounds (mutual mistake, fraud, duress, material breach… Reformation: rewrite to reflect actual agreement; grounds: mutual m… RESTITUTION & UNJUST ENRICHMENT quasi-contract · constructive trust · equitable lien · tracing Unjust Enrichm… benefit conferred… unjust for D to re… Equitable Lien security interest… D's specific prope… Subrogation step into credi… insurer · suret… Constructive Trust — Elements & Tracing Elements: D wrongfully obtained property (fraud, breach of fiduciar… CT vs. equitable lien: CT = ownership (preferred if appreciated); l… TORT DAMAGES & INJUNCTIONS compensatory · punitive · collateral source · 4-part inj. t… Collateral So… insurance doesn't… D's liability Prelim. Injun… likelihood of suc… irreparable harm… Contempt civil: coerci… criminal: pun… Preliminary Injunction — 4-Part Test (1) Likelihood of success on merits; (2) Irreparable harm abse… NY CPLR §6301: prima facie right + danger of irreparable injur… ⚖ REMEDY SELECTION · ELECTION OF REMEDIES · NOMINAL DAMAGES · LIQUIDATED DAMAGES Remedy Selection: Legal remedy adequate? → damages. Inadequate? → equity. Damages inadequate when: subject matter unique (land), D insolvent, harm ongoing, multiple suits needed SP NOT available: personal service contracts (13th Am.); uncertain terms; equitable defenses (laches, unclean hands) Election of remedies: P must elect between inconsistent remedies (rescission OR expectation damages — not both) · Nominal damages: available for intentional torts and K breach even without actual harm Liquidated damages: enforceable if (1) reasonable estimate at time of K AND (2) actual damages difficult to prove — not a penalty · Restitution measure: D's gain (can exceed expectation if D profited greatly)

← scroll to explore · hover nodes (desktop) or tap nodes (mobile) for full detail →

Secured Transactions — NY Bar (MBE + MEE)

Hover / tap nodes · UCC Article 9 · Attachment · Perfection · Priority · Default

SECURED TRANSACTIONS — ATTACHMENT → PERFECTION → PRIORITY → DEFAULT (UCC ART. 9) ATTACHMENT & CREATION PERFECTION PRIORITY RULES DEFAULT & ENFORCEMENT ATTACHMENT value · debtor rights · SA security agreement enforceable against debtor COLLATERAL TYPES goods · instruments · accounts chattel paper · deposit accts consumer · farm · investment prop. PERFECTION filing financing statement possession · control · auto PMSI — 20-day grace period PRIORITY perfected vs. perfected PMSI super-priority lien creditors · buyers DEFAULT & REMEDIES repossession · disposition strict foreclosure deficiency · surplus 3 Requirements (1) value given (2) debtor has r… (3) security agre… Security Agre… written + authen… describes collat… OR possession by… After-Acquired SA can cover fut… property automat… floating lien con… Goods (4 types) consumer · equipm… inventory · farm… fixtures: goods at… Intangibles/Pa… accounts · instru… chattel paper · g… deposit accts · in… Filing (UCC-1) debtor name · SP… collateral descri… file w/ Sec. of Sta… PMSI purchase money se… goods: file withi… of delivery → super… Auto-Perfect… PMSI in consum… goods: no fili… proceeds: 20 da… Priority Ladder PMSI > perfect… lien creditor >… > general unsecured Buyers BIOCOB: buyer in… course of biz. b… consumer buyer ex… Repossession self-help: no br… of peace or judicial proce… Disposition commercially re… notice required public or privat… ATTACHMENT — THREE REQUIREMENTS UCC §9-203 · all three must be satisfied for enforceability Value Given any consideration or antecedent debt Debtor's Rights ownership or other rights in collate… SA Description must reasonably… collateral (§9-1… After-Acquired Property & Proceeds After-acquired clause: SA can cover future-acquired collateral… PERFECTION — METHODS & DURATION UCC §§9-308–9-316 · Filing, possession, control, automatic UCC-1 Filing debtor name (criti… 5-year duration; r… Possession/Con… instruments: posse… deposit accts: con… PMSI Grace P… file within 20… delivery → retr… Perfection by Collateral Type Equipment/Inventory: filing (UCC-1) · Consumer goods PMSI: auto… PRIORITY RULES — KEY CONFLICTS UCC §9-317 to §9-324 · PMSI super-priority · BIOCOB rule First to File/… between two perfec… first to file OR p… PMSI Super-Pri… beats prior perfec… if filed within 20… Lien Creditor perfected SI be… LC beats unperf… BIOCOB & Buyers of Consumer Goods BIOCOB (§9-320(a)): buyer in ordinary course of business takes… DEFAULT & ENFORCEMENT UCC §§9-601–9-628 · commercially reasonable · notice rules Self-Help Repo no breach of peace physical/verbal c… Notice of Sale reasonable authen… notification (10… Deficiency SP may sue fo… if sale price… Strict Foreclosure & Consumer Protections Strict foreclosure (§9-620): SP keeps collateral in full sa… ⚖ PRIORITY HIERARCHY · FILING LOCATION · DEBTOR NAME RULES · BANKRUPTCY TRUSTEE Priority order: (1) PMSI (timely filed) > (2) First to file or perfect > (3) Lien creditor (judgment creditor who levies) > (4) Unperfected SI > (5) General unsecured creditor Filing location: individual → state of residence; registered org (corp/LLC) → state of incorporation/organization (NY: Secretary of State) Debtor name rule: individual → exact name on driver's license/government ID · Organization → exact registered name (minor errors: sufficiency if search would disclose) Bankruptcy trustee = lien creditor as of petition date (strong arm power) beats unperfected SI · PMSI in inventory: must notify prior holders + file before delivery

← scroll to explore · hover nodes (desktop) or tap nodes (mobile) for full detail →

Torts — NY Bar (MBE + NY)

Hover / tap nodes · Negligence · Intentional Torts · Strict Liability · Products · Defamation

TORTS — NEGLIGENCE · INTENTIONAL TORTS · STRICT LIABILITY · PRODUCTS · DEFAMATION (MBE HIGH-FREQUENCY) NEGLIGENCE — DUTY & BREACH CAUSATION · DAMAGES · DEFENSES INTENTIONAL TORTS STRICT LIABILITY · PRODUCTS · DEFAMATION NEGLIGENCE duty · breach · causation damages · defenses reasonable person standard SPECIAL DUTY RULES land occupier · negligence per se professional · omissions NY: unified reasonable care CAUSATION & DAMAGES actual (but-for) · proximate foreseeability · superseding cause compensatory · punitive INTENTIONAL TORTS battery · assault · IIED trespass · conversion · FI intent · transferred intent STRICT LIABILITY abnormally dangerous · animals products liability defamation · privacy torts Duty (General) reasonably fores… Palsgraf zone of… no duty to rescue… Breach reasonable perso… B < PL (Hand… res ipsa loquitur Negligence Pe… statute violation P in class + typ… replaces breach e… Land Occupier… trespasser · lice… invitee · attract… NY: unified standa… Professional D… professional stan… expert testimony… informed consent Actual Causation but-for test substantial facto… Summers v. Tice (a… Proximate Cause foreseeable type… thin skull rule superseding cause Defenses NY: pure compa… assumption of… CPLR Art. 14-A Battery & A… harmful/offensive… apprehension of c… intent to contact… IIED & NIED extreme/outrageo… severe emotional… NIED: zone of dan… Products Liabi… manufacturing ·… failure to warn strict liab. in NY Defamation defamatory statem… publication · dam… public figure: actu… NEGLIGENCE — DUTY & BREACH reasonable person · special duties · res ipsa · negligence per… Res Ipsa Loqui… accident: normall… D had exclusive c… Duty to Act no general duty t… exceptions: speci… Child Standard child of similar… intelligence · e… Land Occupier Duties (MBE vs. NY) MBE: Trespasser (known/anticipated): warn of known artificial d… CAUSATION · DAMAGES · DEFENSES but-for · proximate · NY pure comparative fault · joint & s… Joint & Se… NY Art. 16: limite… ≤50% fault → sever… Damages compensatory: actu… punitive: malice/r… Assumption o… express (contra… implied (volunt… Superseding Causes & NY Comparative Fault Superseding cause cuts off D's liability: unforeseeable indepen… INTENTIONAL TORTS — DETAIL intent · transferred intent · defenses · property torts Trespass to La… intent to enter la… no damage required Trespass/Conve… trespass to chatte… conversion: seriou… Defenses to… consent · self-… defense of othe… Transferred Intent & False Imprisonment Transferred intent: intent to commit one of 5 IT against one pe… STRICT LIABILITY · PRODUCTS · DEFAMATION abnormally dangerous · Restatement §402A · 1st Am. limits Abnorm. Dange… high risk of seri… not of common usa… Products — 3… strict liab · neg… implied warranty Defamation libel vs. sla… slander per se Products Liability & Defamation — NY Products: Manufacturing defect (deviates from design) · Des… ⚖ NY COMPARATIVE FAULT · NEGLIGENCE PER SE · NUISANCE · PRIVACY TORTS NY Pure Comparative Fault (CPLR §1411): P can recover even if 99% at fault — damages reduced by P's share Negligence per se: statute violation establishes breach IF P is in the class the statute was meant to protect AND harm is of the type the statute was meant to prevent Nuisance: private (interference with use/enjoyment of P's land); public (interference with rights of general public) · Thin skull (eggshell plaintiff): D takes P as they find them — liable for full extent of unforeseeable harm Privacy torts: (1) Appropriation of name/likeness (commercial use without consent); (2) Intrusion upon seclusion (highly offensive); (3) False light (widespread false impression — like defamation); (4) Public disclosure of private facts Immunity: charitable immunity abolished in NY · Governmental immunity: NY Court of Claims for state; municipalities liable if special duty · Workers' comp: exclusive remedy bars tort suit against employer Dram shop: NY Alc. Bev. Control Law §11-101

← scroll to explore · hover nodes (desktop) or tap nodes (mobile) for full detail →

Trusts & Future Interests — NY Bar (MEE + NY)

Hover / tap nodes · NY EPTL · Rule Against Perpetuities · MEE high-frequency

TRUSTS & FUTURE INTERESTS — FORMATION THROUGH RAP (MEE HIGH-FREQUENCY · NY EPTL) TRUST FORMATION & TYPES TRUSTEE DUTIES & POWERS FUTURE INTERESTS RAP · MODIFICATION · TERMINATION TRUST FORMATION settlor · trustee · beneficia… res · intent · valid purpose express · resulting · constructive TRUST TYPES revocable · irrevocable testamentary · inter vivos spendthrift · discretionary · purpose TRUSTEE DUTIES loyalty · prudent investor impartiality · duty to inform no self-dealing · diversify FUTURE INTERESTS reversion · remainder vested vs. contingent executory interest · possibility RULE AGAINST PERP. must vest within lives in being + 21 years NY: USRAP (wait & see · 90 yrs) Trust Elements intent · res (pr… ascertainable be… valid lawful purp… Resulting Tru… purchase money:… gets beneficial… failed express tr… Constructive… equitable remedy unjust enrichment wrongful acquisit… Revocable Trust settlor retains… probate avoidance no creditor prote… Spendthrift Tr… beneficiary cann… transfer/assign… creditor exceptio… Duty of Loyalty no self-dealing no conflict of in… no personal profit Prudent Investor risk/return trade… diversify unless… prudent to do so Impartiality balance income beneficiaries… remainder perso… Grantor Intere… reversion: granto… back if interest… possibility of rev… Remainders vested: ascertain… condition precede… contingent: condit… Classic RAP no interest is v… it must vest (if… within 21 yrs of… NY USRAP wait-and-see appr… 90-year savings p… NY EPTL §9-1.1 TRUST FORMATION & TYPES — DETAIL NY EPTL Article 7 · Uniform Trust Code principles Revocable Trus… settlor = trustee… probate avoidance… Irrevocable Tr… creditor protecti… planning benefits Special Trusts charitable · pur… special needs ·… Spendthrift & Discretionary Trusts Spendthrift: beneficiary cannot voluntarily/involuntarily trans… TRUSTEE DUTIES & POWERS Uniform Prudent Investor Act · NY EPTL §11-2.3 No Self-Dealing no transactions be… trustee + trust (p… Duty to Inform keep beneficiaries reasonably informed Delegation may delegate if… select · monito… Trustee Liability & Removal Breach: surcharge (make whole) + disgorgement of profits · Co-t… FUTURE INTERESTS — CLASSIFICATION retained by grantor vs. created in transferee · RAP applies to… Grantor's Inte… Reversion: retaine… interest in grantor Vested Remaind… ascertained person no condition prece… Contingent R… condition prece… OR unborn/unasc… Defeasible Fees & Executory Interests Fee Simple Determinable: "so long as" → Possibility of Reverter… RAP, MODIFICATION & TERMINATION NY EPTL §9-1.1 · USRAP 90-year wait-and-see · cy pres RAP Applicati… contingent remain… executory interes… Modification Claflin doctrine:… modify if materia… Cy Pres charitable tr… redirect to s… RAP Traps & NY Distinctions Unborn widow trap · Fertile octogenarian · Administrative c… ⚖ FUTURE INTEREST QUICK-REFERENCE · VESTED vs. CONTINGENT · RAP CHECKLIST Grantor retains: Reversion (always vested) · Possibility of Reverter (FSD) · Right of Entry/Power of Termination (FSSCS) Transferee gets: Remainder (follows natural expiration of prior estate) or Executory Interest (cuts short or springs) RAP checklist: (1) Identify the interest; (2) Is it vested? If yes, RAP does not apply; (3) Find the validating life (LIB at creation); (4) Will the interest CERTAINLY vest or fail within LIB + 21 years? If not certain → void under classic RAP NY wait-and-see: if might vest within 90 years, wait before voiding

← scroll to explore · hover nodes (desktop) or tap nodes (mobile) for full detail →

UCC Article 2 — Sales of Goods (NY Bar · MEE · MBE)

Hover / tap nodes · Formation · Terms · Performance · Breach · Remedies · Warranties

UCC ARTICLE 2 — SALES OF GOODS (APPLIES TO ALL TRANSACTIONS IN GOODS · MBE + MEE CONTRACTS) FORMATION & TERMS WARRANTIES PERFORMANCE & RISK OF LOSS BREACH & REMEDIES SCOPE & FORMATION goods (movable property) merchant rules apply SOF: $500+ requires writing CONTRACT TERMS §2-207 battle of the forms gap-fillers · firm offer output · requirements K WARRANTIES express · IWM · fitness title · disclaimer privity · limitation of remedy PERFORMANCE perfect tender rule acceptance · rejection cure · installment K BREACH & REMEDIES buyer: cover · market · SP seller: resale · price · profits anticipatory repudiation Goods Defined movable at time… NOT: real proper… services · intang… Merchant Rules deals in goods o… or holds self ou… higher duties app… Statute of Fr… $500+ requires w… exceptions: spec… part perf. · admi… §2-207 Battle… different/additio… in acceptance/con… merchant vs. non-m… Firm Offer §2-… merchant + signed… irrevocable up to… no consideration n… Express Warranty affirmation of fa… description · sam… part of basis of t… Implied Warrant… IWM: fit for ordi… IWFPP: particular… title: good title… Disclaimer IWM: "as is" o… IWFPP: must me… express: very d… Perfect Tender… §2-601: buyer may… if goods fail in… exception: install… Risk of Loss shipment K: on de… destination K: on… breach shifts risk Buyer Remedies cover §2-712 market price §2-… SP §2-716 (unique… Seller Remedies resale §2-706 market price §2-7… lost profits §2-708… FORMATION — UCC vs. COMMON LAW open terms · §2-207 · firm offer · SOF exceptions Open Terms UCC fills gaps: p… place · time · pa… §2-207 Analysis definite expressi… → K formed despit… SOF Exceptions specially manufa… admission in cou… §2-207 Battle of Forms — Full Analysis Step 1: Is there a definite expression of acceptance? If yes → cont… Step 2: What terms govern? Additional terms between merchants: auto… WARRANTIES — THREE TYPES + DISCLAIMER express · IWM · IWFPP · title · privity · limitation IWM §2-314 seller must be a m… fit for ordinary p… IWFPP §2-315 buyer relies on se… seller knows parti… Privity §2-3… 3 alternatives… NY: Alt. A (hou… Warranty Disclaimer Rules Express warranty: cannot be disclaimed if it was part of the basis… IWFPP: disclaimed only in writing and conspicuously · Limitation of… PERFORMANCE, CURE & RISK OF LOSS perfect tender · cure · installment K · FOB · CIF Acceptance §2-… signifies; failure… acts inconsistent… Cure §2-508 before time expire… after: if reasonab… Installment K reject installm… substantial imp… Risk of Loss — Shipment vs. Destination Shipment K (FOB seller's city): risk passes to buyer when seller de… Breach and risk: if seller breaches (defective goods) → risk stays… BREACH & REMEDIES — BUYER & SELLER cover · resale · lost profits · anticipatory repudiation Cover §2-712 cover price − K p… + incidentals − e… Anticipatory… unequivocal refus… sue now or await… Lost Profi… §2-708(2): wh… formula under… Buyer vs. Seller Remedies — Full Chart BUYER (seller breaches): Cover §2-712: cover price − K price +… SELLER (buyer breaches): Resale §2-706: K price − resale price… ⚖ UCC vs. COMMON LAW · MIXED CONTRACTS · LOST VOLUME SELLER · PERFECT TENDER EXCEPTIONS UCC applies to goods (movable property); common law applies to services and real property · Mixed contracts (goods + services): predominant purpose test — which element predominates? If goods → UCC; if services → common law UCC relaxes common law rules: no mirror image rule (§2-207); firm offer without consideration (§2-205); open price terms OK if parties intend a contract (§2-305) Lost volume seller: seller who could have made 2 sales is not made whole by resale proceeds — gets lost profits (§2-708(2)) · Perfect tender exception: installment contracts use substantial impairment standard Revocation of acceptance §2-608: after acceptance, buyer may revoke if defect substantially impairs value AND (a) accepted on reasonable assumption of cure that didn't occur, OR (b) accepted without discovering defect due to difficulty of discovery or seller's assurances Adequate assurance §2-609: if reasonable grounds for insecurity, may demand assurance in writing; treat failure to respond as repudiation

← scroll to explore · hover nodes (desktop) or tap nodes (mobile) for full detail →

Wills — NY Bar (MEE + NY)

Hover / tap nodes · NY EPTL · Surrogate's Court Procedure Act · MEE high-frequency

WILLS — EXECUTION THROUGH INTESTACY (MEE HIGH-FREQUENCY · NY EPTL) EXECUTION & VALIDITY WILL CONTESTS & REVOCATION CONSTRUCTION & GIFTS INTESTACY & ADMINISTRATION WILL EXECUTION writing · signature · witness… testamentary capacity NY EPTL §3-2.1 formalities WILL CONTESTS lack of capacity · undue influence fraud · duress · mistake revocation · revival CONSTRUCTION lapse · anti-lapse · ademption abatement · classification specific · general · residuary INTESTACY NY EPTL §4-1.1 scheme spouse · issue · parents per stirpes · per capita ADMINISTRATION probate · executor duties creditors · distribution elective share · NY SCPA NY Formalities written · signed… 2 witnesses (sig… publication + ack… Test. Capacity 18+ · know natur… know property ·… natural objects o… Holographic W… handwritten + si… no witnesses req… NY does NOT recog… Undue Influence susceptibility +… + motive + causat… presumption: confi… Revocation physical act · su… operation of law partial revocation… Lapse & Ant… lapse: beneficiar… before testator NY EPTL §3-3.3 ant… Ademption specific gift: pr… no longer in esta… identity theory (N… Gift Classif… specific · dem… general · resi… abatement order NY Intestacy Sc… spouse + issue: s… $50k + 1/2; issue… EPTL §4-1.1 Per Stirpes /… NY: per stirpes… divide at first… with living membe… Probate Process file will in Sur… letters testamen… notice to distrib… Elective Share… surviving spouse:… net estate (EPTL… min. $50k WILL EXECUTION — NY REQUIREMENTS NY EPTL §3-2.1 · stricter than UPC · no holographic wills Witness Requir… 2 attesting witne… sign within 30 da… Codicil amendment to will same formalities… Incorporation by reference: do… must exist at ex… NY EPTL §3-2.1 Strict Requirements Written instrument · Signed at end by testator (or by another a… WILL CONTESTS & REVOCATION grounds to invalidate · revocation methods · revival Lack of Capaci… burden on contesta… insane delusion ru… Revocation Met… physical act: burn… subsequent will ·… Revival (NY) revocation of r… NY: re-executio… Fraud, Duress & Dependent Relative Revocation Fraud in execution: deceived about nature of doc · Fraud in ind… CONSTRUCTION & GIFTS lapse · anti-lapse · ademption · abatement order Anti-Lapse (NY) EPTL §3-3.3: prede… issue/sibling → gi… Ademption Deta… specific gift only NY: no satisfactio… Abatement Or… residuary first… general, then s… Accessions, Satisfaction & Exoneration Accessions: property increases (stock splits, dividends) — pass… INTESTACY & ESTATE ADMINISTRATION NY EPTL §4-1.1 · SCPA · elective share · non-probate assets Intestacy Ord… spouse → issue →… → siblings → next… Executor Duti… collect assets ·… file tax returns… Non-Probate joint tenancy… life insuranc… Elective Share & Spousal Rights NY EPTL §5-1.1-A: surviving spouse may elect to take greate… ⚖ NY INTESTACY CHART · ANTI-LAPSE SCOPE · KEY NY DISTINCTIONS FROM UPC NY intestacy (EPTL §4-1.1): Spouse + issue → spouse gets $50k + ½ remainder; issue get balance per stirpes · Spouse only → all to spouse · Issue only → all per stirpes · Parents only → all to parents NY per stirpes = strict per stirpes (divide at first generation with living takers) NY vs. UPC: NY requires strict formalities (no holographic/nuncupative wills) · NY anti-lapse covers issue and siblings of testator only (narrower than UPC) · NY no harmless error rule NY interested witness: gift void but will valid NY revival requires re-execution · NY exoneration: beneficiary takes subject to encumbrance

← scroll to explore · hover nodes (desktop) or tap nodes (mobile) for full detail →

NY Bar Exam Mnemonics

Hover (desktop) or tap (mobile) any card to reveal full breakdown

Civil Procedure

DON'T MOCK THE SYSTEM, FOOL!
Personal Jurisdiction
FREDDY'S A DIVA — $75K
Subject Matter Jurisdiction
ERIE IS EERIE — READ THE ROOM
Erie Doctrine
SAME CLAIM, SAME SHAME
Claim Preclusion (Res Judicata)
ALIEN — Already Litigated, Identical, Essential, Necessary
Issue Preclusion (Collateral Estoppel)

Constitutional Law

NO STANDING? SIT DOWN — I.C.R.
Standing
RATS → INSIDE → BUNKER
Levels of Scrutiny
FIGHTING DOGS OBSCENELY INCITE TRUE COMMERCIALS
Unprotected Speech
DISCRIMINATE? → DIE. BURDEN? → BALANCE.
Dormant Commerce Clause
FUNDAMENTAL = STRICT. EVERYTHING ELSE = RATS.
Substantive Due Process

Contracts / UCC Article 2

MY LEGS FELL OFF — GET IT IN WRITING!
Statute of Frauds
OH, ACE!
Contract Formation
DRUMS FILLED WITH LIES
Defenses to Formation
FRAUD CAN'T HIDE BEHIND PAPER
Parol Evidence Exceptions
EXPECT RICH LAWYERS IN COURT — SPECIFICALLY!
Contract Remedies
RAIN BURNS FIRE — Contract's DEAD
Discharge of Duties

Criminal Law

MURDER 1 → MURDER 2 → VOL MAN → INVOL MAN
Homicide Ladder
SAC OF CRIMES — Only Conspiracy Survives
Inchoate Crimes
SEND CLAIM — 'I DIDN'T MEAN IT!'
Defenses to Crimes
BAD NIGHT — BREAK, ENTER, STEAL
Burglary (Common Law)
LARCENY WALKS, ROBBERY RUNS, BURGLARY BREAKS IN
Larceny vs. Robbery vs. Burglary

Criminal Procedure

SPACESHIP — Cops Don't Need a Warrant
4th Amend. Warrant Exceptions
COPS CAN'T INTERROGATE WITHOUT MIRANDA
Miranda Requirements
GAIA SAVED THE EVIDENCE
Exclusionary Rule Exceptions
AFTER CHARGES, EVERY OFFENSE GETS A LAWYER
6th Amend. Right to Counsel

Evidence

PEOPLE EAT TACOS, RECORDS MATTER, BUT JUDGES READ...
Hearsay Exceptions — 803
MIMIC THE CRIMINAL
Character Evidence — 404(b)
DEAD PEOPLE TALK: FORMER, AGAINST, DYING, STATEMENT
Hearsay — Unavailable (804)
ATTACK THE WITNESS: BIAS, BAD ACTS, CONVICTIONS...
Impeachment
STOP LIARS FROM PLEADING RICH — S.L.I.P.P.R.
FRE 403 + Policy Exclusions

Real Property

HOSTILE ALIEN OPENLY CAMPING — EXCLUSIVELY, CONTINUOUSLY
Adverse Possession
GRANDPA KEEPS: REVERSION, RIGHT OF ENTRY, POSSIBILITY OF REVERTER
Future Interests — Grantor's
REMAINDERS WAIT, EXECUTORY INTERESTS ATTACK
Future Interests — Third Party
RACE TO NOTICE — NY'S A RACE-NOTICE STATE
Recording Acts
I GRIDSLED ACROSS MY LAND
Valid Deed
QUIET! WARRANTY! MITIGATE! HABITABILITY! DELIVER!
Landlord-Tenant Duties

Torts

BAD FAITH
Intentional Torts to Person
DUTY, BREACH, CAUSE, DAMAGES — D.B.C.D.
Negligence
RINS — Res Ipsa, Negligence per Se
Special Negligence Doctrines
WILD ANIMALS MAKE DEFECTIVE PRODUCTS EXPLODE
Strict Liability

Business Associations

AREA — Actual, Ratification, Estoppel, Apparent
Types of Authority (Agency)
CARE + LOYALTY = GOOD FAITH
Fiduciary Duties
ALTER EGO + FRAUD + UNDERFUNDED = VEIL PIERCED
Piercing the Corporate Veil
DEMAND FIRST — Then SUE FOR THE CORP
Shareholder Derivative Suit

Conflict of Laws

TORTS = INTERESTS, CONTRACTS = GRAVITY
NY Choice of Law
SAME = EASY. DIFFERENT = HEADACHE.
Neumeier Rules

Family Law (NY)

I ACCA — Irretrievable + Adultery, Cruelty, Confinement, Abandonment
Grounds for Divorce (NY)
ALSO HIDE INCOME? JUDGE DIVIDES EVERYTHING.
Equitable Distribution Factors
SAFE PARENT WINS
Best Interest of the Child

NY Practice & Procedure

T.O.R.T. — Transact, Own, Real property Tort, Tortious act
NY Long-Arm (CPLR 302)
1-2-3-6 — REMEMBER THE NUMBERS!
NY Statute of Limitations
DUCK JABS FAST
Motions to Dismiss (CPLR 3211)

Trusts & Estates

18, SIGNED, PUBLISHED, 2 WITNESSES, 30 DAYS
Valid Will (NY)
F.U.C.I. THE WILL
Will Contests
SETTLE IT
Trust Creation
SPOUSE TAKES FIRST, KIDS SPLIT THE REST
NY Intestate Distribution

Secured Transactions

VCR — Value, Contract, Rights
Attachment
FILE IT, HOLD IT, OR IT'S AUTOMATIC
Perfection Methods
PERFECTED BEATS UNPERFECTED. FIRST FILED WINS. PMSI IS KING.
Priority Rules

Professional Responsibility

DON'T BE A C.R.I.M.I.N.A.L. LAWYER
Grounds for Discipline
CAN YOU STILL FIGHT FOR YOUR CLIENT?
Conflicts of Interest
S.N.A.P.!
Client Trust Account (IOLA)
CONFIDENTIALITY IS BROAD, PRIVILEGE IS NARROW
Confidentiality vs. Privilege

MEE / MPT Strategy

F → S → E → W: FACT, SO WHAT, ELEMENT, WHO WINS
Wigmorean Method — Every Issue
SPOT → STATE → SMASH → STAMP
MEE Essay Blueprint
TASK → LIBRARY → FILE → FORMAT → TIME
MPT Attack Plan

NY Bar Legal Terminology

Hover (desktop) or tap (mobile) any card to reveal full definition

Civil Procedure

Personal Jurisdiction
Tap or hover for definition
Subject Matter Jurisdiction
Tap or hover for definition
Removal
Tap or hover for definition
Res Judicata
Tap or hover for definition
Collateral Estoppel
Tap or hover for definition
Forum Non Conveniens
Tap or hover for definition
Interpleader
Tap or hover for definition
Impleader
Tap or hover for definition
Voir Dire
Tap or hover for definition
Summary Judgment
Tap or hover for definition

Constitutional Law

Strict Scrutiny
Tap or hover for definition
Intermediate Scrutiny
Tap or hover for definition
Rational Basis
Tap or hover for definition
Incorporation Doctrine
Tap or hover for definition
State Action Doctrine
Tap or hover for definition
Dormant Commerce Clause
Tap or hover for definition
Substantive Due Process
Tap or hover for definition
Ripeness
Tap or hover for definition
Mootness
Tap or hover for definition
Prior Restraint
Tap or hover for definition

Contracts

Consideration
Tap or hover for definition
Promissory Estoppel
Tap or hover for definition
Anticipatory Repudiation
Tap or hover for definition
Parol Evidence Rule
Tap or hover for definition
Unconscionability
Tap or hover for definition
Statute of Frauds
Tap or hover for definition
Accord and Satisfaction
Tap or hover for definition
Mitigation of Damages
Tap or hover for definition
Specific Performance
Tap or hover for definition
Conditions Precedent
Tap or hover for definition

Criminal Law

Mens Rea
Tap or hover for definition
Actus Reus
Tap or hover for definition
Felony Murder
Tap or hover for definition
Conspiracy
Tap or hover for definition
Attempt
Tap or hover for definition
Exclusionary Rule
Tap or hover for definition
Miranda Rights
Tap or hover for definition
Double Jeopardy
Tap or hover for definition
Entrapment
Tap or hover for definition
Accomplice Liability
Tap or hover for definition

Evidence

Hearsay
Tap or hover for definition
Hearsay Exceptions (Unavailable Declarant)
Tap or hover for definition
Hearsay Exceptions (Availability Immaterial)
Tap or hover for definition
Res Ipsa Loquitur
Tap or hover for definition
Best Evidence Rule
Tap or hover for definition
Impeachment
Tap or hover for definition
Relevance
Tap or hover for definition
Prejudice Balancing (Rule 403)
Tap or hover for definition
Privilege Against Self-Incrimination
Tap or hover for definition
Attorney-Client Privilege
Tap or hover for definition

Real Property

Fee Simple Absolute
Tap or hover for definition
Rule Against Perpetuities
Tap or hover for definition
Easement
Tap or hover for definition
Recording Acts
Tap or hover for definition
Adverse Possession
Tap or hover for definition
Marketable Title
Tap or hover for definition
Covenant of Quiet Enjoyment
Tap or hover for definition
Equitable Conversion
Tap or hover for definition
Mortgage
Tap or hover for definition
Fixture
Tap or hover for definition

Torts

Negligence
Tap or hover for definition
Proximate Cause
Tap or hover for definition
Comparative Negligence
Tap or hover for definition
Strict Liability
Tap or hover for definition
Respondeat Superior
Tap or hover for definition
Intentional Infliction of Emotional Distress
Tap or hover for definition
Defamation
Tap or hover for definition
Attractive Nuisance
Tap or hover for definition
Joint and Several Liability
Tap or hover for definition
Loss of Consortium
Tap or hover for definition

NY Practice (CPLR)

CPLR Long-Arm Statute (§ 302)
Tap or hover for definition
Notice of Claim
Tap or hover for definition
Article 78 Proceeding
Tap or hover for definition
Statute of Limitations (NY)
Tap or hover for definition
CPLR 3211 Motion to Dismiss
Tap or hover for definition
Preliminary Conference (CPLR 3104)
Tap or hover for definition
Summary Judgment (CPLR 3212)
Tap or hover for definition
Verified Complaint
Tap or hover for definition
CPLR 3101 — Disclosure
Tap or hover for definition
Stipulation of Discontinuance
Tap or hover for definition

Family Law (NY)

Equitable Distribution
Tap or hover for definition
Maintenance (Spousal Support)
Tap or hover for definition
Best Interests of the Child
Tap or hover for definition
Grounds for Divorce (NY)
Tap or hover for definition
Prenuptial Agreement
Tap or hover for definition
Child Support Standards Act
Tap or hover for definition
Order of Protection
Tap or hover for definition
Paternity
Tap or hover for definition

Business Associations

Piercing the Corporate Veil
Tap or hover for definition
Business Judgment Rule
Tap or hover for definition
Duty of Care
Tap or hover for definition
Duty of Loyalty
Tap or hover for definition
Derivative Suit
Tap or hover for definition
Apparent Authority
Tap or hover for definition
Respondeat Superior (Agency)
Tap or hover for definition
Dissolution (Partnership)
Tap or hover for definition

Trusts & Future Interests

Express Trust
Tap or hover for definition
Resulting Trust
Tap or hover for definition
Constructive Trust
Tap or hover for definition
Spendthrift Clause
Tap or hover for definition
Cy Pres Doctrine
Tap or hover for definition
Pour-Over Will
Tap or hover for definition
Prudent Investor Rule
Tap or hover for definition
Elective Share (NY)
Tap or hover for definition

Conflict of Laws

Interest Analysis
Tap or hover for definition
Lex Loci Delicti
Tap or hover for definition
Center of Gravity Test
Tap or hover for definition
Full Faith and Credit
Tap or hover for definition
Renvoi
Tap or hover for definition

Remedies

Expectation Damages
Tap or hover for definition
Injunction
Tap or hover for definition
Restitution
Tap or hover for definition
Liquidated Damages
Tap or hover for definition
Quasi-Contract (Unjust Enrichment)
Tap or hover for definition
Punitive Damages
Tap or hover for definition
Constructive Trust (Remedy)
Tap or hover for definition

Secured Transactions (UCC Art. 9)

Attachment
Tap or hover for definition
Perfection
Tap or hover for definition
Purchase Money Security Interest (PMSI)
Tap or hover for definition
Financing Statement (UCC-1)
Tap or hover for definition
After-Acquired Property Clause
Tap or hover for definition
Buyer in the Ordinary Course (BIOCOB)
Tap or hover for definition

Professional Responsibility

Competence (Rule 1.1)
Tap or hover for definition
Confidentiality (Rule 1.6)
Tap or hover for definition
Conflict of Interest — Current Clients (Rule 1.7)
Tap or hover for definition
IOLA Account
Tap or hover for definition
Pro Hac Vice
Tap or hover for definition
Imputed Disqualification (Rule 1.10)
Tap or hover for definition
Duty of Candor to Tribunal (Rule 3.3)
Tap or hover for definition
Solicitation
Tap or hover for definition

NY Bar Exam Flashcards

332 cards across 18 subjects · Click to flip · Track mastery

NY Bar MEE Sample Questions & Model Answers

Hover (desktop) or tap (mobile) any question card to reveal the full model answer · 5 questions × 12 subjects

Civil ProcedureQuestion 1
Paula, a citizen of New York, was injured in a car accident in New Jersey caused by Dan, a citizen of New Jersey. Paula's medical bills total $85,000. Paula filed suit in the United States District Court for the Southern…
Civil ProcedureQuestion 2
Alice filed a complaint in federal court alleging that Bob breached a contract. Bob answered and asserted a counterclaim against Alice for tortious interference with Bob's business relations with a third party, Carol. Al…
Civil ProcedureQuestion 3
During discovery in a federal civil lawsuit, plaintiff Pam served defendant Drake with interrogatories, requests for production of documents, and a notice of deposition. Drake objected to all interrogatories on grounds o…
Civil ProcedureQuestion 4
GlobeTech, a Delaware corporation with its principal place of business in California, manufactures GPS devices. It sells to retailers nationwide through an online portal. Apex Retailer, Inc., incorporated in Texas with i…
Civil ProcedureQuestion 5
Paula sued Defendant Driver for negligence arising from a car accident in federal court. The jury returned a verdict for Driver and judgment was entered. Paula did not appeal. Six months later, Paula filed a new federal …
Contracts / UCCQuestion 1
Owen, a wheat farmer, sent a signed letter to Grainco, a grain merchant, stating: "I offer to sell you my entire 2025 wheat harvest at $6.00 per bushel. This offer will remain open for 30 days." Grainco received the lett…
Contracts / UCCQuestion 2
Clara, a homeowner, contracted with Builder to renovate her kitchen for $40,000. The written contract stated: "Builder to complete renovation by June 1. Time is of the essence." Builder substantially completed the work b…
Contracts / UCCQuestion 3
TechCorp ordered 500 custom-configured laptops from Vendor at $1,200 each for a total of $600,000. The written contract required delivery by October 1. Vendor delivered 500 laptops on October 1, but 50 of them had defect…
Contracts / UCCQuestion 4
Paula and Dan orally agreed that Dan would sell Paula his rare vintage guitar collection — 12 guitars — for $15,000, to be paid in full and delivered in 60 days. The parties shook hands but signed nothing. Two weeks late…
Contracts / UCCQuestion 5
NuConstruct, Inc. submitted a detailed bid of $2.1 million to serve as general contractor on a municipal library project, relying on subcontractor quotes including a $400,000 electrical quote from Watts Electric. NuConst…
Constitutional LawQuestion 1
The State of Clio enacted a statute requiring any out-of-state trucking company to obtain a special permit before transporting goods through the state, while in-state companies could transport goods without restriction. …
Constitutional LawQuestion 2
Congress enacted the "Safe Communities Act," which required all state and local law enforcement agencies to collect and report data on undocumented immigrants they encounter to a federal immigration database. A state ref…
Constitutional LawQuestion 3
A state public university adopted a policy prohibiting any student organization from endorsing, sponsoring, or participating in any political campaign activity, including distributing campaign materials. A student politi…
Constitutional LawQuestion 4
The State of Norden enacted two statutes. The first, the "Felon Disenfranchisement Reform Act," restored voting rights to all formerly incarcerated individuals except those convicted of election-related crimes. A state s…
Constitutional LawQuestion 5
Harbortown City adopted a comprehensive wetlands preservation ordinance that prohibited any construction, filling, or development on parcels designated as "protected wetlands." Owen purchased a 10-acre coastal parcel for…
Criminal Law & ProcedureQuestion 1
Dan was deeply in debt and decided to kill his wealthy uncle, Victor, to inherit money. Dan invited Victor to dinner and put poison in Victor's food. Victor ate the meal but did not die because the "poison" Dan used was …
Criminal Law & ProcedureQuestion 2
Officers received an anonymous tip that drugs were being sold from a blue car parked outside a convenience store. They observed a blue car in the location described. An officer approached and asked the driver, Sam, "Can …
Criminal Law & ProcedureQuestion 3
Police arrested Tom for burglary. At the police station, officers read Tom his Miranda rights. Tom said, "I think I might want a lawyer." Officers then continued to question Tom. Tom eventually confessed. Tom moves to su…
Criminal Law & ProcedureQuestion 4
Alec and Benny agreed to rob a convenience store. Alec waited in the getaway car while Benny entered the store with a gun. During the robbery, Benny pistol-whipped the cashier so severely that the cashier died three days…
Criminal Law & ProcedureQuestion 5
Dana was charged in state court with aggravated assault. After a two-day jury trial, the jury was deadlocked and the judge declared a mistrial over Dana's objection that the deadlock was manufactured by prosecutorial mis…
EvidenceQuestion 1
Paula sues Dan for personal injuries after a car accident. Dan's attorney seeks to introduce evidence that: (a) one week after the accident, Dan repaired a broken brake line on the car; (b) Dan has a reputation in the co…
EvidenceQuestion 2
In a criminal trial, the prosecution offers the following evidence: (a) a statement made by the defendant to his friend, saying "I did it and I'd do it again"; (b) a written diary entry, found at defendant's home, in whi…
EvidenceQuestion 3
In a civil malpractice case against Dr. Adams, plaintiff offers the expert testimony of Dr. Baker, who reviewed plaintiff's medical records and opines that Dr. Adams's treatment fell below the standard of care. Dr. Adams…
EvidenceQuestion 4
Paula sues Dan for breach of contract. At trial, Paula seeks to introduce three items: (1) a printout of an email chain that Paula claims Dan sent, offering to sell Paula his business for $500,000; Dan denies sending the…
EvidenceQuestion 5
In a fraud trial, the government's star witness, Wendy, testifies on direct that she saw Defendant sign a fraudulent document on March 15. On cross-examination, defense counsel asks whether Wendy gave a statement to poli…
Real PropertyQuestion 1
Owen conveyed Blackacre "to Alice for life, then to Bob if Bob survives Alice, but if Bob does not survive Alice, to Carol and her heirs." Two years later, Bob conveyed his interest to Dan by deed. Owen died. Alice died.…
Real PropertyQuestion 2
Landlord leased an apartment to Tenant for a 2-year term. The lease required Tenant to pay $1,500/month rent. Six months into the lease, Tenant discovered the apartment's heating system was completely inoperable during w…
Real PropertyQuestion 3
Adam owned Greenacre. In 2018, Adam conveyed Greenacre to Beth by warranty deed, which Beth did not record. In 2019, Adam conveyed Greenacre to Carol by quitclaim deed, which Carol immediately recorded. Carol paid $100,0…
Real PropertyQuestion 4
For 21 years, Nancy openly maintained, farmed, and fenced a 2-acre strip of land adjacent to her property that actually belongs to her neighbor, Owen, who lives out of state and has never visited or objected. Nancy alway…
Real PropertyQuestion 5
Paula borrowed $400,000 from Bank, secured by a properly recorded mortgage on Greenacre. She later borrowed $100,000 from Finance Co., also secured by a mortgage on Greenacre, which was also recorded. Paula defaulted on …
TortsQuestion 1
Paula was walking on a sidewalk when a beam from a construction site owned by BuildCo fell and struck her, causing severe injuries. BuildCo had hired Contractor to perform construction work. Contractor was an independent…
TortsQuestion 2
Dave manufactures a power saw. The saw has a blade guard that, under normal use, can pop off unexpectedly, exposing the blade. Dave's engineering team was aware of the design issue before production but determined that f…
TortsQuestion 3
Tom intentionally pushed Lucy, causing her to fall. Lucy, who had a pre-existing osteoporosis condition, suffered a severe broken hip that would not have occurred in a person with normal bone density. Tom argues he shoul…
TortsQuestion 4
Larry owns a hardware store. One evening after closing, a trespassing teenager, Tommy, climbs the fence around Larry's back lot to retrieve a lost ball and falls into an uncovered, unmarked machinery pit. The pit is left…
TortsQuestion 5
Victor is a private citizen who coaches a local youth soccer league. A local newspaper published an article stating: "Victor has been found by league officials to have embezzled $15,000 in league funds." The statement wa…
Business AssociationsQuestion 1
Alice and Bob formed a partnership to operate a restaurant. Neither signed a written partnership agreement. Without telling Alice, Bob entered into a three-year lease on a larger commercial space, representing himself as…
Business AssociationsQuestion 2
Carol is the CEO and a director of XYZ Corporation. The board approved a real estate acquisition for $5 million. Carol, without telling the board, had personally purchased the target property the week before the board me…
Business AssociationsQuestion 3
PharmaStart LLC was formed by three members: Ann (40%), Beth (40%), and Cal (20%). The operating agreement was silent on management. Ann and Beth voted to distribute all profits to themselves without any distribution to …
Business AssociationsQuestion 4
Paula and Dan incorporated PD Corp., each owning 50% of the shares. They never held formal board meetings, commingled personal and corporate funds, paid personal expenses from the corporate account, and never maintained …
Business AssociationsQuestion 5
Dana is a senior analyst at InvestBank, which was retained to advise on TargetCo's potential acquisition by AcquireCo. Dana learned material, non-public information that the acquisition would proceed at a 40% premium. Be…
Conflict of LawsQuestion 1
Paula, domiciled in State A, was injured in a car accident in State B, caused by Dave, domiciled in State A. State A applies the doctrine of contributory negligence (any fault by plaintiff bars recovery). State B applies…
Conflict of LawsQuestion 2
A contract was negotiated in State X, signed in State Y, to be performed in State Z. The contract contained a choice-of-law clause selecting State Y law. The dispute concerns whether the contract is enforceable. State X …
Conflict of LawsQuestion 3
Wanda, domiciled in State A, died intestate. She owned real property in State B and personal property (bank accounts and investments) in State C. Her heirs dispute whether her cousin or her spouse is entitled to inherit …
Conflict of LawsQuestion 4
Paula, domiciled in State A, obtained a valid default judgment in State A against Dan, also domiciled in State A, for $150,000 in a breach of contract action. Dan later moved to State B and acquired property there. Paula…
Conflict of LawsQuestion 5
Mark and Susan were married while domiciled in State A. Mark moved to State B six months ago to take a new job and intends to remain there permanently. Susan remained in State A with their two children. Mark filed for di…
Family LawQuestion 1
Mark and Susan married in State A, which recognizes common law marriage. They lived together for 10 years, held themselves out as married, and filed joint tax returns. They then moved to State B, which does not recognize…
Family LawQuestion 2
Ann and Bill divorced after 15 years of marriage. During the marriage, Bill worked full-time while Ann left a career as an accountant to raise their three children. At divorce, the marital estate includes the family home…
Family LawQuestion 3
Kate and Paul divorced. Kate was awarded sole physical custody of their daughter Emma, age 8. Paul has scheduled visitation every other weekend. Paul wants to relocate from State X to State Y for a new job, taking Emma w…
Family LawQuestion 4
Alan and Beth were married for 18 years. Alan, a physician, earned $600,000 per year. Beth gave up a nursing career to raise their three children, who are now teenagers. At the time of divorce, Beth had been out of the w…
Family LawQuestion 5
Carl and Dana divorced five years ago. The divorce decree ordered Carl to pay $2,000 per month in child support for their two minor children. Carl recently lost his job and has paid nothing for eight months. He owes $16,…
Trusts & EstatesQuestion 1
Ted executed a will leaving all his property to his friend Sam. Three years later, Ted married Alice. Ted never updated his will. Two years after the marriage, Ted died. Alice seeks a share of Ted's estate. Under state l…
Trusts & EstatesQuestion 2
Mary created a revocable living trust naming herself as trustee and her daughter Lisa as successor trustee and sole beneficiary. The trust provided that Mary could amend or revoke it at any time during her lifetime. When…
Trusts & EstatesQuestion 3
Richard's will left his estate equally among his three children: Anna, Beth, and Carl. Before Richard died, Anna died leaving her own two children (Richard's grandchildren). The will did not address what happens if a ben…
Trusts & EstatesQuestion 4
Victor, age 85, suffered from moderate dementia. His daughter, Donna, moved in with him and managed his affairs. One week before Victor died, Donna drove him to a lawyer's office where he executed a new will leaving his …
Trusts & EstatesQuestion 5
Grantor established a trust leaving $1 million "to the City Library Foundation, to be used exclusively for the purchase of rare books." The City Library Foundation dissolved five years after the trust was created, making…
Secured TransactionsQuestion 1
On January 1, Farmer borrowed $50,000 from Bank to purchase a new combine harvester. Bank took a security interest in the harvester. Bank filed a financing statement in the proper state office on January 5. Farmer purcha…
Secured TransactionsQuestion 2
Dan operated a sporting goods store. He financed his inventory with loans from SportBank, which had a perfected security interest in Dan's existing and after-acquired inventory and proceeds. Dan later sold a shipment of …
Secured TransactionsQuestion 3
Paula purchased a car, granting First Credit Union a security interest. First Credit Union perfected by noting its lien on the certificate of title. Paula later defaulted. First Credit Union repossessed the car without j…
Secured TransactionsQuestion 4
On January 1, Lender entered into a security agreement with Borrower, a furniture retailer, granting Lender a security interest in "all inventory now owned or hereafter acquired, and all proceeds thereof." Lender filed a…
Secured TransactionsQuestion 5
Borrower Corp. filed for Chapter 7 bankruptcy on September 1. Before filing, on August 15, Borrower had paid $30,000 to unsecured creditor Vendor, who had been owed the money for 90 days. Borrower also had granted Bank a…
Legal Reasoning Platform

Structure Your
Legal Reasoning.
Win the Argument.

The first platform built on Wigmore’s chart method — turning scattered case notes into unbreakable, element-by-element proof chains for bar exam preparation, litigation strategy, and legal education.

Prevent circular logic. Expose missing elements. Map counter-inferences. Built on 100 + years of evidence scholarship.

TESTIMONY Corroborating witness DOCUMENT Signed contract, p. 4 COUNTER-EVID Alibi (contested) ELEMENT Proved burden met VERDICT all elements

Wigmorean proof chain — nodes, inferential arrows, and counter-evidence

📋 Scattered notes hide logical gaps

Linear outlines cannot show missing elements, circular support, or weak inferential links. Those gaps surface at trial — too late to fix.

🔄 Circular reasoning goes undetected

When “A proves B proves A,” no flat document catches it. A DAG makes circular logic structurally impossible — the graph simply cannot close.

⚖️ Missing elements appear at the worst moment

Every element node must have supporting links. Nothing is assumed. Every gap is visible before you write a brief or walk into a hearing.


The Wigmorean Method

Built on a century of evidence scholarship

John Henry Wigmore developed the chart method in 1913 as a rigorous system for mapping every inference leading to an ultimate probandum. Anderson, Schum & Twining formalised it into modern proof theory. This platform is the first interactive implementation of that tradition.

Why DAGs? →
01
Define the ultimate probandum Start with the legal claim — every element that must be proved to prevail.
02
Map all evidence nodes Each piece of evidence becomes a discrete node: testimony, document, inference, or presumption.
03
Draw directional inferential links Arrows show “A supports B.” No return arrow is possible — no circular logic by design.
04
Stress-test with counter-inference Map objections and attacks directly onto the weakest links before opposing counsel does.

Who Uses It

Built for every stage of the legal career

From first-year bar prep to appellate brief — one method, one platform, every context where structured reasoning wins.

💳 Subscription 🏛 Institutional Licensing 🗂 Template Marketplace 🎓 CLE Certification
🔭
Phase II — Expanding Beyond Law

After validating in the legal market, the platform expands into clinical nursing reasoning, medical differential diagnosis, business risk mapping, and structured educational argument — same method, field-specific templates, enterprise licensing.


Scholarly Foundation

Grounded in published scholarship

This platform is informed by published scholarship on evidence, proof, and structured reasoning. Listed for scholarly context only.

John Henry Wigmore John Henry Wigmore

Pioneer of chart-based evidence analysis. His 1913 system for mapping all inferences to an ultimate probandum is the direct intellectual ancestor of every DAG this platform produces.

Analysis of Evidence, Cambridge Anderson · Schum · Twining

Analysis of Evidence (Cambridge University Press) formalises tools for constructing and criticising arguments about facts, evaluating evidence, and using chart methods to structure proof and reasoning across legal contexts.

Kọ́lá Abímbọ́lá Kọ́lá Abímbọ́lá

Wigmorean Analysis, transactional law and compliance specialist, 25 + years’ experience. Professor with expertise in logic, abductive reasoning, forensic science, and law.

Home Interactive Demo
Wigmorean Proof Chains

Interactive DAG Demo

The Wigmorean chart method applies beyond the courtroom. Each diagram below maps a real-world reasoning problem as a Directed Acyclic Graph — from a landmark criminal trial to scientific reclassification to medical diagnosis. Nodes are discrete evidence items or intermediate inferences. Gold arrows show inferential support; red dashed lines show counter-inferences that must be resolved.

DNA · BLOOD 1-in-170M match Bundy · Bronco · Rockingham TRACE Aris Light glove pair Bruno Magli size 12 prints TIMELINE No alibi 9:36–10:54 PM Bronco absent · dark figure PHYSICAL LINK Three independent chains converge on Simpson MOTIVE 1989 battery · 62 incidents 911 calls · stalking pattern FLIGHT Bronco slow-speed chase Disguise · passport · $8K cash CONTAMINATION LAPD lab · Fuhrman “If it doesn’t fit…” PROBANDUM Simpson committed the murders
Inferential support (three independent evidence chains converge)
Counter-inference (defense: evidence contamination & police misconduct)
Ultimate probandum

Following Anderson & Twining’s Wigmorean methodology (Analysis of Evidence, 2005), the prosecution’s case derives its power from convergence: three independent evidence streams — DNA blood matching Simpson at 1-in-170 million across the crime scene, his vehicle, and his home; physical trace evidence linking a split pair of Aris Light gloves and size-12 Bruno Magli shoe prints; and an unaccounted timeline with the Bronco absent during the murder window — all point to a single physical-link inference. Motive evidence (documented domestic violence including a 1989 battery conviction) and flight conduct (the Bronco chase with a disguise, passport, and cash) provide additional support. The defense counter-inference attacks the convergence node itself: LAPD crime-lab contamination, Detective Fuhrman’s credibility and racial bias, and the courtroom glove demonstration sought to sever the evidentiary chains from their conclusion. The jury’s acquittal rested on resolving this counter-inference in Simpson’s favor — collapsing the physical-link hub despite the prosecution’s convergent architecture.

Home Why DAGs?
Graph Theory · Legal Reasoning

Why Directed Acyclic Graphs?

A DAG is a directed graph with no directed cycles. In legal reasoning, that means no circular support is structurally possible: every claim must be supported by evidence through explicit, one-way inferential links. This is not a stylistic choice — it is a logical constraint that makes incomplete reasoning immediately visible.

No circular logic — by design

DAGs enforce “A supports B” without letting B secretly support A. The moment a cycle is attempted the structure breaks — before the argument reaches a judge or examiner.

Complete element coverage

You cannot hide a missing element. Every legal requirement must have at least one incoming evidentiary arrow. Empty nodes are visible immediately, not at trial.

Stress-testable proof chains

Counter-inferences and attacks are mapped directly onto the weakest inferential links. You see exactly where your argument can be broken — and fix it first.

See it live: Demo DAG →
Scroll to Top